ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2020
An open structure questionnaire on reasons for delay in presentation: a study of patients attending clinic with red flag symptoms of head and neck cancer.
Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patient Perceptions and Type 1 Delay in Head and Neck Cancer: A Scoping Review of High- and Low-/Middle-Income Countries.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2026Review
- Machine Learning in Clinical Diagnosis of Head and Neck Cancer.Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery · 2025Observational
- Nomenclature of the symptoms of head and neck cancer: a systematic scoping review.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeReasons for delayed presentation in cancer are reported as patient or professional delays. Studies have examined patient demographic factors associated with presentation delay, but it is currently unknown why patients feel they delayed presenting.
methodsQuestionnaire study of consecutive patients attending an urgent suspicion of cancer clinic at a tertiary referral centre in Glasgow over a 3-month period.
results395 patients were included. 53 (13%) patients waited 0-7 days, 164 (41%) patients 1-4 weeks, 139 (35%) 1-12 months and 31 (8%) waited longer than 12 months, before presenting. 8 (3%) did not state length of time before presentation. 123 (31%) patients were not worried about their symptoms. 5 of the 13(38%) patients diagnosed with head and neck cancer, waited up to 12 months. 5 (38%) cancer patients delayed presentation because they were not worried about symptoms.
conclusionPatients with head and neck cancer are not worried about their symptoms and delay their presentation, possibly contributing towards later stage diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
32170423What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.