Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32170422›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2020

Developing a national e-learning course in otorhinolaryngology: the Danish experience.

Helena Fagö-Olsen, Charlotte Duch Lynggaard, Kasper Aanæs, Per Cayé-Thomasen, Steven Arild Wuyts Andersen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Helena Fagö-OlsenDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Nordsjællands Hospital, Dyrehavevej 29, 3400, Hillerød, Denmark. anna.malin.helena.fagoe-olsen.02@regionh.dk.
Charlotte Duch LynggaardDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Kasper AanæsDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Per Cayé-ThomasenDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Steven Arild Wuyts AndersenDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeE-learning provides a flexible and effective approach to learning and is increasingly used in otorhinolaryngology (ORL). We developed a national theoretical e-learning course for ORL trainees and describe our experiences with implementation as well as piloting the e-learning course.

methodsE-learning course content was developed as structured multiple choice quizzes for the European core curriculum textbook. An open-source learning management system was adapted for a self-paced e-learning course. We piloted the e-learning course as a non-mandatory option for the 15 residents participating in the Danish 4-day national training course in rhinology in February 2019. A post-course survey was sent out to the participants and used in the evaluation along with activity data from the learning management system.

resultsFourteen out of 15 trainees participated in the e-learning course. Nine participants completed > 95% of the course. The activity data demonstrated that participants with the highest completion rate typically began well in advance of the course (> 2 months). Overall the e-learning course was rated positively in relation to learning and as preparation for the national training course. Participants responded that the level of the e-learning course was higher than and also at times in slight incongruity with the content of the national curriculum. Participants would like protected study time for e-learning activities in their residency program. All participants responded that they would use e-learning in relation to future national training courses.

conclusionsDeveloping a national e-learning course is feasible and is well-received by trainees as well as other educational stakeholders.

Indexed as

Computer-Assisted InstructionInternship and ResidencyOtolaryngologyClinical CompetenceCurriculumDenmarkHumansCourse designE-learningImplementation strategyNational training curriculumOtorhinolaryngology

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.