ReviewApplied microbiology and biotechnology2020
A re-evaluation of diastatic Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains and their role in brewing.
Review in Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- Phylogenomic diversity of clinicalMicrobiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Replicative age differentially predicts metabolic competence across industrial yeasts at single-cell resolution.FEMS yeast research · 2026Article
- Article
- PCR-fingerprinting of culturable yeasts from commercially obtained beers: a simple and engaging applied microbiological laboratory exercise.microPublication biology · 2025Article
- The Potential of Co-Fermentation withFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Inhibition of diastatic yeasts byApplied and environmental microbiology · 2024Article
- Ploidy evolution in a wild yeast is linked to an interaction between cell type and metabolism.PLoS biology · 2023Article
- Traditional Fermented Foods from Ecuador: A Review with a Focus on Microbial Diversity.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Yeast Strains and Wort Color as Factors Affecting Effects of the Ethanol Fermentation Process.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Unique Brewing-Relevant Properties of a Strain ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diastatic strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae possess the unique ability to hydrolyze and ferment long-chain oligosaccharides like dextrin and starch. They have long been regarded as important spoilage microbes in beer, but recent studies have inspired a re-evaluation of the significance of the group. Rather than being merely wild-yeast contaminants, they are highly specialized, domesticated yeasts belonging to a major brewing yeast lineage. In fact, many diastatic strains have unknowingly been used as production strains for decades. These yeasts are used in the production of traditional beer styles, like saison, but also show potential for creation of new beers with novel chemical and physical properties. Herein, we review results of the most recent studies and provide a detailed account of the structure, regulation, and functional role of the glucoamylase-encoding STA1 gene in relation to brewing and other fermentation industries. The state of the art in detecting diastatic yeast in the brewery is also summarized. In summary, these latest results highlight that having diastatic S. cerevisiae in your brewery is not necessarily a bad thing. KEY POINTS: •Diastatic S. cerevisiae strains are important spoilage microbes in brewery fermentations. •These strains belong to the 'Beer 2' or 'Mosaic beer' brewing yeast lineage. •Diastatic strains have unknowingly been used as production strains in breweries. •The STA1-encoded glucoamylase enables efficient maltotriose use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.