Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32170385›Full record

ArticleApplied microbiology and biotechnology2020

Anaerobic 1,4-dioxane biodegradation and microbial community analysis in microcosms inoculated with soils or sediments and different electron acceptors.

Vidhya Ramalingam, Alison M Cupples

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Vidhya RamalingamDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Alison M CupplesDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA. cupplesa@egr.msu.edu.
Michigan State University · US

Funding

Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program W912HQ-17-C-0006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

1,4-Dioxane, a probable human carcinogen, is a co-contaminant at many chlorinated solvent-contaminated sites. Although numerous 1,4-dioxane-degrading aerobic bacteria have been isolated, almost no information exists on the microorganisms able to degrade this chemical under anaerobic conditions. Here, the potential for 1,4-dioxane biodegradation was examined using multiple inocula and electron acceptor amendments. The inocula included uncontaminated agricultural soils and river sediments as well as sediments from two 1,4-dioxane contaminated sites. Five separate experiments involved the examination of triplicate live microcosms and abiotic controls for approximately 1 year. Compound-specific isotope analysis (CSIA) was used to further investigate biodegradation in a subset of the microcosms. Also, DNA was extracted from microcosms exhibiting 1,4-dioxane biodegradation for microbial community analysis using 16S rRNA gene amplicon high-throughput sequencing. Given the long incubation periods, it is likely that electron acceptor depletion occurred and methanogenic conditions eventually dominated. The iron/EDTA/humic acid or sulfate amendments did not result in 1,4-dioxane biodegradation in the majority of cases. 1,4-dioxane biodegradation was most commonly observed in the nitrate amended and no electron acceptor treatments. Notably, both contaminated site sediments illustrated removal in the samples compared to the abiotic controls in the no electron acceptor treatment. However, it is important to note that the degradation was slow (with concentration reductions occurring over approximately 1 year). In two of the three cases examined, CSIA provided additional evidence for 1,4-dioxane biodegradation. In one case, the reduction in 1,4-dioxane in the samples comparing the controls was likely too low for the method to detect a significant

Indexed as

MicrobiotaSoil MicrobiologyAnaerobiosisBiodegradation, EnvironmentalDioxanesElectronsGeologic SedimentsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingRNA, Ribosomal, 16SWater Pollutants, Chemical1,4-dioxaneDioxanesRNA, Ribosomal, 16SWater Pollutants, Chemical1,4-Dioxane3 genus incertae sedisAnaerobic biodegradationComamonadaceaeMonitored natural attenuationPseudoxanthomonas

Identifiers

PMID32170385
OpenAlexW3010762085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.