ReviewHerz2020
Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy : Evolving from unique clinical features to a complex pathophysiological concept.
Review in Herz, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of autoantibodies to desmoglein-2 in dogs with and without cardiac disease.Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC), an inherited heart muscle disease, is characterized by a progressive replacement of viable, in its classic form predominantly right ventricular myocardium by fibro-fatty tissue. These pathological alterations may provide the substrate for the occurrence of life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmias, heart failure, and sudden cardiac death. The clinical course in this young patient population is highly variable, diagnostic algorithms complex, and individualized treatment strategies yet to be refined. Molecular genetic analyses have revealed both heterozygous and compound mutations in genes encoding for desmosomal proteins that are an integral part of the intercellular architecture. However, its diagnostic and prognostic impact remains to be elucidated. Over time, other genetic (i.e., non-desmosomal) and non-genetic causes (phenocopies) have been identified, and biventricular and left dominant manifestations (ALVC) are known. Based on a qualitative scoring system, initially published in 1994, diagnostic criteria were revised and substantiated by quantitative criteria in 2010 followed by a critical appraisal 9 years later. In 1995, ARVC was included in the classification of cardiomyopathies of the World Health Organization but was recently proposed to be subsumed in a broader concept termed "arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy" (AC). This review provides an update on the clinical diagnosis and differential diagnoses of ARVC as well as our current understanding of the underlying pathogenesis, and it sheds light on new efforts in risk stratification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.