Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32170259›Full record

Trial reportBritish dental journal2020

Blended learning as an adjunct to tutor-led seminars in undergraduate orthodontics: a randomised controlled trial.

Sri Jeganathan, Padhraig S Fleming

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in British dental journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Perceptions of Dental Teachers about Blended Learning: A Qualitative Analysis.International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. RoboEthics in COVID-19: A Case Study in Dentistry.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sri JeganathanBarts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Padhraig S FlemingBarts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK. padhraig.fleming@qmul.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims To describe the use of blended learning as a method of undergraduate orthodontic teaching delivery and to assess its effectiveness in terms of knowledge gain.Design Randomised controlled trial.Setting Queen Mary University of London.Materials and methods Seventy dental undergraduate students in their fifth year were randomly allocated to receive orthodontic seminar-based teaching either using a blended approach based on an e-learning resource or with no prior teaching. All students were asked to complete tests both before (T0) and after (T1) the study period.Results The mean post-test score in the intervention group was 98.3% (a 19% improvement on baseline), while the mean score in the control group was 97.2% with intra-group improvements being statistically significant in both groups (P <0.001). However, no significant difference in terms of improvement in knowledge was found between the two groups (P = 0.36). In terms of satisfaction, 82% of the blended group and 74% in the control group rated the teaching as 'very good'.Conclusions An undergraduate orthodontic-oral surgery e-learning adjunct to traditional teaching was successfully developed. Blending and traditional seminar teaching appear to be equally effective in terms of short-term knowledge gain, with high levels of learner satisfaction common to both approaches.

Indexed as

OrthodonticsSurgery, OralDental CareHumansLearningStudents, DentalTeaching

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.