Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32170201›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2020

Ecosystem-wide metagenomic binning enables prediction of ecological niches from genomes.

Johannes Alneberg, Christin Bennke, Sara Beier, Carina Bunse, Christopher Quince, Karolina Ininbergs, Lasse Riemann, Martin Ekman, Klaus Jürgens, Matthias Labrenz and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Quantifying microbial guilds.ISME communications · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Johannes AlnebergDepartment of Gene Technology, Science for Life Laboratory, School of Engineering Sciences in Chemistry, Biotechnology and Health, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2467-008X
Christin BennkeLeibniz Institute for Baltic Sea Research, Warnemünde, Germany.
Sara BeierLeibniz Institute for Baltic Sea Research, Warnemünde, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3707-4487
Carina BunseCentre for Ecology and Evolution in Microbial Model Systems, Linnaeus, University, Kalmar, Sweden.
Christopher QuinceWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Karolina IninbergsDepartment of Ecology, Environment and Plant Sciences, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Lasse RiemannDepartment of Biology, Marine Biological Section, University of Copenhagen, Helsingør, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9207-2543
Martin EkmanDepartment of Ecology, Environment and Plant Sciences, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
Klaus JürgensLeibniz Institute for Baltic Sea Research, Warnemünde, Germany.
Matthias LabrenzLeibniz Institute for Baltic Sea Research, Warnemünde, Germany.
Jarone PinhassiCentre for Ecology and Evolution in Microbial Model Systems, Linnaeus, University, Kalmar, Sweden.
Anders F AnderssonDepartment of Gene Technology, Science for Life Laboratory, School of Engineering Sciences in Chemistry, Biotechnology and Health, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden. anders.andersson@scilifelab.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3627-6899

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The genome encodes the metabolic and functional capabilities of an organism and should be a major determinant of its ecological niche. Yet, it is unknown if the niche can be predicted directly from the genome. Here, we conduct metagenomic binning on 123 water samples spanning major environmental gradients of the Baltic Sea. The resulting 1961 metagenome-assembled genomes represent 352 species-level clusters that correspond to 1/3 of the metagenome sequences of the prokaryotic size-fraction. By using machine-learning, the placement of a genome cluster along various niche gradients (salinity level, depth, size-fraction) could be predicted based solely on its functional genes. The same approach predicted the genomes' placement in a virtual niche-space that captures the highest variation in distribution patterns. The predictions generally outperformed those inferred from phylogenetic information. Our study demonstrates a strong link between genome and ecological niche and provides a conceptual framework for predictive ecology based on genomic data.

Indexed as

EcosystemGenome, ArchaealGenome, BacterialMetagenomeAquatic OrganismsArchaeaBacteriaBase SequenceEcologyMachine LearningMetagenomicsPhylogenyPlanktonSequence Analysis, DNA

Identifiers

PMID32170201
PMCPMC7070063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.