Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32170148›Full record

ReviewNPJ systems biology and applications2020

Towards a widespread adoption of metabolic modeling tools in biopharmaceutical industry: a process systems biology engineering perspective.

Anne Richelle, Blandine David, Didier Demaegd, Marianne Dewerchin, Romain Kinet, Angelo Morreale, Rui Portela, Quentin Zune, Moritz von Stosch

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in NPJ systems biology and applications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. A Hybrid Modeling Framework for Predictive Digital Twins of CHO Cell Culture.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Machine Learning and Hybrid Methods for Metabolic Pathway Modeling.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Anne RichelleGSK, Rixensart, Belgium. anne.x.richelle@gsk.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1491-114X
Blandine DavidGSK, Rixensart, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2603-8766
Didier DemaegdGSK, Rixensart, Belgium.
Marianne DewerchinGSK, Rixensart, Belgium.
Romain KinetGSK, Rixensart, Belgium.
Angelo MorrealeGSK, Rixensart, Belgium.
Rui PortelaGSK, Rixensart, Belgium.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3627-6477
Quentin ZuneGSK, Rixensart, Belgium.
Moritz von StoschGSK, Rixensart, Belgium. moritz.x.von-stosch@gsk.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In biotechnology, the emergence of high-throughput technologies challenges the interpretation of large datasets. One way to identify meaningful outcomes impacting process and product attributes from large datasets is using systems biology tools such as metabolic models. However, these tools are still not fully exploited for this purpose in industrial context due to gaps in our knowledge and technical limitations. In this paper, key aspects restraining the routine implementation of these tools are highlighted in three research fields: monitoring, network science and hybrid modeling. Advances in these fields could expand the current state of systems biology applications in biopharmaceutical industry to address existing challenges in bioprocess development and improvement.

Indexed as

BioengineeringBiological ProductsBiotechnologyIndustryModels, BiologicalSystems BiologyBiological Products

Identifiers

PMID32170148
PMCPMC7070029

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.