Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32170062›Full record

ArticleNature communications2020

Thermodynamics of continuous non-Markovian feedback control.

Maxime Debiossac, David Grass, Jose Joaquin Alonso, Eric Lutz, Nikolai Kiesel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Maxime Debiossac *Faculty of Physics, VCQ, University of Vienna, Boltzmanngasse 5, A-1090, Vienna, Austria. maxime.debiossac@univie.ac.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0264-2168
David Grass *Faculty of Physics, VCQ, University of Vienna, Boltzmanngasse 5, A-1090, Vienna, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1781-0969
Jose Joaquin AlonsoDepartment of Physics, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, D-91058, Erlangen, Germany.
Eric LutzInstitute for Theoretical Physics I, University of Stuttgart, D-70550, Stuttgart, Germany.
Nikolai KieselFaculty of Physics, VCQ, University of Vienna, Boltzmanngasse 5, A-1090, Vienna, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Feedback control mechanisms are ubiquitous in science and technology, and play an essential role in regulating physical, biological and engineering systems. The standard second law of thermodynamics does not hold in the presence of measurement and feedback. Most studies so far have extended the second law for discrete, Markovian feedback protocols; however, non-Markovian feedback is omnipresent in processes where the control signal is applied with a non-negligible delay. Here, we experimentally investigate the thermodynamics of continuous, time-delayed feedback control using the motion of an optically levitated, underdamped microparticle. We test the validity of a generalized second law which bounds the energy extracted from the system, and study the breakdown of feedback cooling for very large time delays.

Identifiers

PMID32170062
PMCPMC7070085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.