Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32170057›Full record

ArticleNature communications2020

Paradoxical activation of the protein kinase-transcription factor ERK5 by ERK5 kinase inhibitors.

Pamela A Lochhead, Julie A Tucker, Natalie J Tatum, Jinhua Wang, David Oxley, Andrew M Kidger, Victoria P Johnson, Megan A Cassidy, Nathanael S Gray, Martin E M Noble and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Anticancer drugs: How to select small molecule combinations?Trends in pharmacological sciences · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. OXTRNature communications · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Pamela A LochheadSignalling Laboratory, The Babraham Institute, Babraham Research Campus, Cambridge, CB22 3AT, UK. pamela.lochhead@babraham.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7498-0177
Julie A TuckerYork Biomedical Research Institute and Department of Biology, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6119-676X
Natalie J TatumCRUK Newcastle Drug Discovery Unit, Newcastle University Centre for Cancer, Newcastle University, Newcastle, NE2 4HH, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3878-9265
Jinhua WangDepartment of Cancer Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1214-4103
David OxleySignalling Laboratory, The Babraham Institute, Babraham Research Campus, Cambridge, CB22 3AT, UK.
Andrew M KidgerSignalling Laboratory, The Babraham Institute, Babraham Research Campus, Cambridge, CB22 3AT, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3808-0582
Victoria P JohnsonSignalling Laboratory, The Babraham Institute, Babraham Research Campus, Cambridge, CB22 3AT, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1530-2322
Megan A CassidySignalling Laboratory, The Babraham Institute, Babraham Research Campus, Cambridge, CB22 3AT, UK.
Nathanael S GrayDepartment of Cancer Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
Martin E M NobleCRUK Newcastle Drug Discovery Unit, Newcastle University Centre for Cancer, Newcastle University, Newcastle, NE2 4HH, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3595-9807
Simon J CookSignalling Laboratory, The Babraham Institute, Babraham Research Campus, Cambridge, CB22 3AT, UK. simon.cook@babraham.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9087-1616
Babraham Institute · GBHarvard University · USNewcastle University · GBUniversity of York · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/J004456/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/N015886/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/P013384/1Cancer Research UK 21421Cancer Research UK A21421Medical Research Council MR/K007580/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The dual protein kinase-transcription factor, ERK5, is an emerging drug target in cancer and inflammation, and small-molecule ERK5 kinase inhibitors have been developed. However, selective ERK5 kinase inhibitors fail to recapitulate ERK5 genetic ablation phenotypes, suggesting kinase-independent functions for ERK5. Here we show that ERK5 kinase inhibitors cause paradoxical activation of ERK5 transcriptional activity mediated through its unique C-terminal transcriptional activation domain (TAD). Using the ERK5 kinase inhibitor, Compound 26 (ERK5-IN-1), as a paradigm, we have developed kinase-active, drug-resistant mutants of ERK5. With these mutants, we show that induction of ERK5 transcriptional activity requires direct binding of the inhibitor to the kinase domain. This in turn promotes conformational changes in the kinase domain that result in nuclear translocation of ERK5 and stimulation of gene transcription. This shows that both the ERK5 kinase and TAD must be considered when assessing the role of ERK5 and the effectiveness of anti-ERK5 therapeutics.

Indexed as

Gene Expression RegulationHEK293 CellsHeLa CellsHumansInflammationMitogen-Activated Protein Kinase 7Models, MolecularMutationProtein ConformationProtein DomainsProtein Kinase InhibitorsTranscription FactorsTranscription, GeneticMAPK7 protein, humanMitogen-Activated Protein Kinase 7Protein Kinase InhibitorsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID32170057
PMCPMC7069993
OpenAlexW3012485400

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.