Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32170007›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2020

Targeted inhibition of gut bacterial β-glucuronidase activity enhances anticancer drug efficacy.

Aadra P Bhatt, Samuel J Pellock, Kristen A Biernat, William G Walton, Bret D Wallace, Benjamin C Creekmore, Marine M Letertre, Jonathan R Swann, Ian D Wilson, Jose R Roques and 9 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 118 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
118citing papers in PubMed
9.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

118 citing papers in PubMed, 189 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

58 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Aadra P BhattDepartment of Chemistry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3290.ORCID 0000-0002-0134-6543
Samuel J PellockDepartment of Chemistry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3290.ORCID 0000-0002-7557-7985
Kristen A BiernatDepartment of Chemistry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3290.
William G WaltonDepartment of Chemistry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3290.
Bret D WallaceDepartment of Chemistry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3290.
Benjamin C CreekmoreDepartment of Chemistry, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3290.
Marine M LetertreComputational and Systems Medicine, Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, SW7 2AZ London, United Kingdom.
Jonathan R SwannComputational and Systems Medicine, Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, SW7 2AZ London, United Kingdom.
Ian D WilsonComputational and Systems Medicine, Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, SW7 2AZ London, United Kingdom.
Jose R RoquesLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599.
David B DarrLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599.
Sean T BaileyLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599.
Stephanie A MontgomeryLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599.
Jeffrey M RoachDepartment of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7555.ORCID 0000-0001-9817-5877
M Andrea Azcarate-PerilDepartment of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7555.ORCID 0000-0003-0325-1289
R Balfour SartorDepartment of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7555.ORCID 0000-0002-7820-632X
Raad Z GharaibehDepartment of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610.
Scott J BultmanLineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599.
Matthew R RedinboDepartment of Biochemistry, Integrated Program for Biological and Genome Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3290; redinbo@unc.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-0814-5346
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USImperial College London · GBUniversity of Florida · US

Funding

Virology Research Program (Program 4)P30CA016086 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI David Darr · 1985 to 2026
$201.5M
UNC-CH CENTER FOR ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH &SUSCEPTIBILITYP30ES010126 · NIEHS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Stephanie Engel · 2001 to 2026
$36.3M
UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CLINICAL NUTRITION RESEARCH UNITP30DK056350 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Ian Michael Carroll · 1999 to 2026
$31.6M
PILOT AND FEASIBILITY STUDIESP30DK034987 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Temitope O. Keku · 1985 to 2026
$30.5M
Role of IL-10 in APC Regulation of Protective vs. Pathogenic T Cell Responses toP01DK094779 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI SARTOR, RYAN B · 2013 to 2023
$17.9M
National Gnotobiotic Rodent Resource CenterP40OD010995 · OD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Ryan B Sartor · 2012 to 2026
$9.7M
GASTROENTEROLOGY RESEARCH TRAININGT32DK007737 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI SHEHZAD Z. SHEIKH · 1996 to 2026
$7.8M
Improving CPT-11 Efficacy Using Structural BiologyR01CA098468 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI REDINBO, MATTHEW R · 2003 to 2018
$3.9M
Microbiome-Targeted Probes to Eliminate Chemotherapy-Induced GI ToxicityR01CA207416 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI REDINBO, MATTHEW R · 2016 to 2018
$1.7M
Structural Basis for Hormone and Neurotransmitter Processing by Gut Microbial EnzymesR01GM135218 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI REDINBO, MATTHEW R · 2019 to 2022
$1.5M
Understanding and Controlling Drug Metabolism by the Gut Microbiota to Improve Human HealthR01GM137286 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI REDINBO, MATTHEW R · 2020 to 2023
$1.2M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016086NCI NIH HHS R01 CA098468NCI NIH HHS R01 CA207416NIDDK NIH HHS P01 DK094779NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK034987NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK056350NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007737NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES010126NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM135218NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM137286NIH HHS P40 OD010995
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Irinotecan treats a range of solid tumors, but its effectiveness is severely limited by gastrointestinal (GI) tract toxicity caused by gut bacterial β-glucuronidase (GUS) enzymes. Targeted bacterial GUS inhibitors have been shown to partially alleviate irinotecan-induced GI tract damage and resultant diarrhea in mice. Here, we unravel the mechanistic basis for GI protection by gut microbial GUS inhibitors using in vivo models. We use in vitro, in fimo, and in vivo models to determine whether GUS inhibition alters the anticancer efficacy of irinotecan. We demonstrate that a single dose of irinotecan increases GI bacterial GUS activity in 1 d and reduces intestinal epithelial cell proliferation in 5 d, both blocked by a single dose of a GUS inhibitor. In a tumor xenograft model, GUS inhibition prevents intestinal toxicity and maintains the antitumor efficacy of irinotecan. Remarkably, GUS inhibitor also effectively blocks the striking irinotecan-induced bloom of Enterobacteriaceae in immune-deficient mice. In a genetically engineered mouse model of cancer, GUS inhibition alleviates gut damage, improves survival, and does not alter gut microbial composition; however, by allowing dose intensification, it dramatically improves irinotecan's effectiveness, reducing tumors to a fraction of that achieved by irinotecan alone, while simultaneously promoting epithelial regeneration. These results indicate that targeted gut microbial enzyme inhibitors can improve cancer chemotherapeutic outcomes by protecting the gut epithelium from microbial dysbiosis and proliferative crypt damage.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicBacteriaDisease Models, AnimalDysbiosisEnzyme InhibitorsFemaleGastrointestinal MicrobiomeGlucuronidaseHumansIrinotecanMiceMice, NudeNeoplasmsAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicEnzyme InhibitorsGlucuronidaseIrinotecancancerchemotherapygastrointestinal toxicitymicrobiome

Identifiers

PMID32170007
PMCPMC7132129
OpenAlexW3011301336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.