ArticleBMJ open2020
What hinders congenital ectopia lentis patients' follow-up visits? A qualitative study.
Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effect of WeChat Application Combined Phone Reminder on Follow-up Adherence Improvement in Congenital Ectopia Lentis Patients : A Randomized Controlled Trial
Follow up Study on Visual Prognosis and Complications of Ectopia Lentis Lens
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Health service access and delivery for people living with rare disorders: a scoping review.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2026Article
- Prediction of vulnerability to mental health symptoms in children with congenital ectopia lentis: development and validation of a prediction model.Eye (London, England) · 2025Article
- Depressive and anxiety symptoms in caregivers of children with congenital ectopia lentis: a prospective cross-sectional study.BMJ open · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe aim of our study is to give insight into congenital ectopia lentis (CEL) patients' care-seeking behaviour and explore the factors affecting their follow-up visits.
designCross-sectional study; in-depth and face-to-face semistructured interview.
settingA large-scale ophthalmology hospital in China.
participants35 patients with CEL and their parents from May 2017 to August 2017.
main outcome measuresThemes and categories. The interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, coded and analysed using grounded theory. Data collection was closed when new themes did not emerge in subsequent dialogues.
resultsThe factors affecting the timely visits included insufficient awareness of CEL, shame on hereditary disease, lack of effective doctor-patient communication, lack of reliable information online and daily stressors.
conclusionContinuing medical education of severe and rare disease, reforming the pattern of medical education, constructing an interactive platform of the disease on the internet and improving healthcare policy are effective ways to improve the diagnosis and treatment status of CEL in China.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.