Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32169677›Full record

ArticleCortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior2020

Activation in bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNST) corresponds to everyday helping.

Kruti M Vekaria, Katherine O'Connell, Shawn A Rhoads, Kristin M Brethel-Haurwitz, Elise M Cardinale, Emily L Robertson, Brian Walitt, John W VanMeter, Abigail A Marsh

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Pharmacological Inactivation of the Bed Nucleus of the Stria Terminalis Increases Affiliative Social Behavior in Rhesus Macaques.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Kruti M VekariaDepartment of Psychology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA. Electronic address: kmv39@georgetown.edu.
Katherine O'ConnellInterdisciplinary Program in Neuroscience, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
Shawn A RhoadsDepartment of Psychology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
Kristin M Brethel-HaurwitzDepartment of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Elise M CardinaleNational Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Emily L RobertsonDepartment of Psychology, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, USA.
Brian WalittNational Institute of Nursing Research, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
John W VanMeterDepartment of Neurology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA.
Abigail A MarshDepartment of Psychology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
Georgetown University · USNational Institutes of Health · USLouisiana State University · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Predoctoral Training in Intergrative NeuroscienceT32NS041231 · NINDS · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI Ludise Malkova, Ashley S VanMeter · 2001 to 2026
$6.8M
Translational Biomedical Science Training GrantTL1TR001431 · NCATS · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI LEE, DEXTER L, SANDBERG, KATHRYN L · 2015 to 2024
$4.8M
Georgetown-Howard Universities Center for Clinical and Translational Science (GHUKL2RR031974 · NCRR · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI VERBALIS, JOSEPH G · 2010 to 2011
$711k
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR001431NCRR NIH HHS KL2 RR031974NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS041231
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Everyday prosociality includes helping behaviors such as holding doors or giving directions that are spontaneous and low-cost and are performed frequently by the average person. Such behaviors promote a wide array of positive outcomes that include increased well-being, trust, and social capital, but the cognitive and neural mechanisms that support these behaviors are not yet well understood. Whereas costly altruistic responding to others' distress is associated with elevated reactivity in the amygdala, we hypothesized that everyday prosociality would be more closely associated with activation in the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BNST), a region of the extended amygdala known for its roles in maintaining vigilance for relevant socio-affective environmental cues and in supporting parental care. One previous study of the neural correlates of everyday prosociality highlighted a functional cluster identified as the septal area but which overlapped with established coordinates of BNST. We used an anatomical mask of BNST (Torrisi et al., 2015) to evaluate the association of BNST activation and daily helping in a sample of 25 adults recruited from the community as well as 23 adults who had engaged in acts of extraordinary altruism. Results found that activation in left BNST during an empathy task predicted everyday helping over a subsequent 14-day period in both samples. BNST activation most strongly predicted helping strangers and proactive helping. We conclude that beyond facilitating care for offspring, activation in BNST may provide a basis for the motivation to engage in a broad array of everyday helping behaviors.

Indexed as

Septal NucleiAmygdalaCuesThalamusBNSTEmpathyExperience samplingProsocial behavior

Identifiers

PMID32169677
PMCPMC7239753
OpenAlexW3007730517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.