Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32168967›Full record

ArticleMicroorganisms2020

Screening of Bacteriocinogenic Lactic Acid Bacteria and Their Characterization as Potential Probiotics.

Ana Pinto, Joana Barbosa, Helena Albano, Joana Isidro, Paula Teixeira

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microorganisms, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Bacteriocin production byRSC advances · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Identification and Characterization ofFood science of animal resources · 2025
    Article
  6. Probiotic characteristics and whole genome sequencing ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Characterization ofMicroorganisms · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Probiotic ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ana PintoEscola Superior de Biotecnologia, CBQF-Centro de Biotecnologia e Química Fina-Laboratório Associado, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Rua Diogo Botelho 1327, 4169-005 Porto, Portugal.
Joana BarbosaEscola Superior de Biotecnologia, CBQF-Centro de Biotecnologia e Química Fina-Laboratório Associado, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Rua Diogo Botelho 1327, 4169-005 Porto, Portugal.
Helena AlbanoEscola Superior de Biotecnologia, CBQF-Centro de Biotecnologia e Química Fina-Laboratório Associado, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Rua Diogo Botelho 1327, 4169-005 Porto, Portugal.
Joana IsidroBioinformatics Unit, Department of Infectious Diseases, National Institute of Health, 1649-016 Lisbon, Portugal.
Paula TeixeiraEscola Superior de Biotecnologia, CBQF-Centro de Biotecnologia e Química Fina-Laboratório Associado, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Rua Diogo Botelho 1327, 4169-005 Porto, Portugal.
Universidade Católica Portuguesa · PTNational Institute of Health Dr. Ricardo Jorge · PT

Funding

Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia SFRH/BPD/113303/2015Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia UID/Multi/50016/2019undefined <span style="color:gray;font-size:10px;">undefined</span> NORTE-01-0246-FEDER-000043
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Probiotics are living microorganisms used as nutritional additives that confer health benefits on the host. Their use in food products is very attractive, especially if they could also inhibit important foodborne pathogens. In this study, antimicrobial activity against several foodborne pathogens was screened for 280 lactic acid bacteria (LAB) isolated from different food products and the probiotic characteristics of bacteriocinogenic isolates were evaluated. Seven out of 280 LAB isolates were selected due to their bacteriocinogenic properties and identified by 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis as

Indexed as

antimicrobial activitybacteriocinlactic acid bacteriaprobiotic

Identifiers

PMID32168967
PMCPMC7142618
OpenAlexW3011924891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.