ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2020
RETRACTED: Neuroprotective Effects of Dried Tubers of
Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- RETRACTED: Shoaib et al. Neuroprotective Effects of Dried Tubers ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Correction: Shoaib et al. Neuroprotective Effects of Dried Tubers ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Plant-Derived Chemicals: A Source of Inspiration for New Drugs.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2025-12-07Concerns/Issues about Image · Duplication of/in Image · Euphemisms for Duplication · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Objections by Author(s) · Original Data and/or Images not Provided and/or not Available · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions · Updated to Retraction · Upgrade/Update of Prior Notice(s) · · See also: https://pubpeer.com/publications/E54AA1FA90160A1D8085BAA89C9264
- Correction · 2021-12-27Concerns/Issues about Image · Duplication of/in Image · Error in Image · Error in Text · Investigation by Third Party · Updated to Retraction · · See also: https://pubpeer.com/publications/E54AA1FA90160A1D8085BAA89C9264
- Erratum issued
- Retracted
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The present study was designed to explore the neuroprotective properties of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.