Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32168839›Full record

ReviewMicroorganisms2020

Sana Jemel, Jacques Guillot, Kalthoum Kallel, Françoise Botterel, Eric Dannaoui

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microorganisms, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed
10.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Journal of medical microbiology · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Salvianolic acid B synergizes with azoles againstFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Drug Discovery and Repurposing forJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The role of innate immunity, antibiotics, and bacteriophages in the course of bacterial infections and their treatment.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  20. Chitosan nanoparticles encapsulating farnesol evaluated in vivo against Candida albicans.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2024
    Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sana JemelEA Dynamyc UPEC, EnvA, USC Anses, Faculté de Médecine de Créteil, 94000 Créteil, France.
Jacques GuillotEA Dynamyc UPEC, EnvA, USC Anses, Faculté de Médecine de Créteil, 94000 Créteil, France.
Kalthoum KallelUniversité Tunis EL Manar, Faculté de médecine de Tunis, Tunis 1007, Tunisia.
Françoise BotterelEA Dynamyc UPEC, EnvA, USC Anses, Faculté de Médecine de Créteil, 94000 Créteil, France.
Eric DannaouiEA Dynamyc UPEC, EnvA, USC Anses, Faculté de Médecine de Créteil, 94000 Créteil, France.
Tunis University · TNUniversité Paris-Est Créteil · FRDélégation Paris 5 · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The treatment of invasive fungal infections remains challenging and the emergence of new fungal pathogens as well as the development of resistance to the main antifungal drugs highlight the need for novel therapeutic strategies. Although in vitro antifungal susceptibility testing has come of age, the proper evaluation of therapeutic efficacy of current or new antifungals is dependent on the use of animal models. Mammalian models, particularly using rodents, are the cornerstone for evaluation of antifungal efficacy, but are limited by increased costs and ethical considerations. To circumvent these limitations, alternative invertebrate models, such as

Indexed as

Galleria mellonella, Aspergillus spp., Candida spp., antifungal, pharmacokinetics

Identifiers

PMID32168839
PMCPMC7142887
OpenAlexW3011465664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.