Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32168829›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2020

En-Bloc Resection of Metastases of the Proximal Femur and Reconstruction by Modular Arthroplasty is Not Only Justified in Patients with a Curative Treatment Option-An Observational Study of a Consecutive Series of 45 Patients.

Oliver E Bischel, Arnold J Suda, Paul M Böhm, Burkhard Lehner, Rudi G Bitsch, Jörn B Seeger

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Clinical application of LARS tumor tube in joint function reconstruction of tumor type artificial hip replacement.Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. CementedOrthopedic reviews · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Oliver E BischelBG Trauma Center at University of Heidelberg, Ludwig-Guttmann-Str. 13, 67 071 Ludwigshafen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9221-3908
Arnold J SudaAUVA Trauma Center Salzburg, Academic Teaching Hospital of the Paracelsus Medical University, Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Dr.-Franz-Rehrl-Platz 5, 5010 Salzburg, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-7194-8726
Paul M BöhmGeneral Orthopedics, Neumeyerstr. 46, 90 411 Nuremberg, Germany.
Burkhard LehnerDepartment of Orthopedics and Traumatology, University of Heidelberg, Schlierbacher Landstr. 200a, 69 118 Heidelberg, Germany.
Rudi G BitschAtos Clinic, Bismarckstraße 9-15, 69115 Heidelberg, Germany.
Jörn B SeegerParc Clinic, Am Kaiserberg 2-4, 61 231 Bad Nauheim, Germany.
Heidelberg University · DEKerckhoff Klinik · DENuremberg Hospital · DEParacelsus Medical University · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is little conformity regarding the surgical treatment of metastasis of the proximal femur, especially in palliative patients with limited life expectancy. PATIENTS AND

methodsEn-bloc resection of secondary bone malignancies of the proximal femur and reconstruction by modular arthroplasty was performed in a consecutive series of 45 patients. The mean follow-up period was 16.4 months (0.6-74.7).

resultsThe survival rate of all patients was 6.6% (95% CI: 0-14.9) at 74.7 months. There was no significant difference in patients with a solitary or disseminated disease at index operation (log-rank

conclusionsEn-bloc resection of metastases and reconstruction by modular arthroplasty is reliable even in patients with very limited life expectancy. Local complications due to tumor growth or instability after intralesional surgery could be managed successfully but recurrent dislocation as the most frequent complication has to be taken into account. The simple bonding of remaining soft tissue around the prosthesis without the use of an attachment tube may reduce the dislocation rate and reoperation risk.

Indexed as

megaprosthesisproximal femursecondary bone tumorsurvival of implantsurvival of patients

Identifiers

PMID32168829
PMCPMC7141379
OpenAlexW3012219001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.