Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32168751›Full record

ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Biobased Materials from Microbial Biomass and Its Derivatives.

Celeste Cottet, Yuly A Ramirez-Tapias, Juan F Delgado, Orlando de la Osa, Andrés G Salvay, Mercedes A Peltzer

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
11.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 96 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Valorization of Mushroom Residues for Functional Food Packaging.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Release of Biopolymers fromMicroorganisms · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Functional characterization of biodegradable films obtained from whole Paecilomyces variotii biomass.International microbiology : the official journal of the Spanish Society for Microbiology · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Celeste CottetMaterials Development and Evaluation Laboratory (LOMCEM), Department of Science and Technology, National University of Quilmes, B1876BXD Bernal, Argentina.
Yuly A Ramirez-TapiasMaterials Development and Evaluation Laboratory (LOMCEM), Department of Science and Technology, National University of Quilmes, B1876BXD Bernal, Argentina.
Juan F DelgadoMaterials Development and Evaluation Laboratory (LOMCEM), Department of Science and Technology, National University of Quilmes, B1876BXD Bernal, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0002-3604-8773
Orlando de la OsaMaterials Development and Evaluation Laboratory (LOMCEM), Department of Science and Technology, National University of Quilmes, B1876BXD Bernal, Argentina.
Andrés G SalvayMaterials Development and Evaluation Laboratory (LOMCEM), Department of Science and Technology, National University of Quilmes, B1876BXD Bernal, Argentina.
Mercedes A PeltzerMaterials Development and Evaluation Laboratory (LOMCEM), Department of Science and Technology, National University of Quilmes, B1876BXD Bernal, Argentina.
National University of Quilmes · AR

Funding

Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica (Argentina) PICT-2015-3150National Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET) RESOL-2018-2703-APN-DIR#CONICET and Res. 4845/2014Scientific Research Commission (CIC), Buenos Aires, Argentina Resol-2018-621-GDEBA-CICMCTI Ref. RI-2157-888-18 (Scholarship)Universidad Nacional de Quilmes (UNQ, Argentina) R&D program PUNQ 990/19
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a strong public concern about plastic waste, which promotes the development of new biobased materials. The benefit of using microbial biomass for new developments is that it is a completely renewable source of polymers, which is not limited to climate conditions or may cause deforestation, as biopolymers come from vegetal biomass. The present review is focused on the use of microbial biomass and its derivatives as sources of biopolymers to form new materials. Yeast and fungal biomass are low-cost and abundant sources of biopolymers with high promising properties for the development of biodegradable materials, while milk and water kefir grains, composed by kefiran and dextran, respectively, produce films with very good optical and mechanical properties. The reasons for considering microbial cellulose as an attractive biobased material are the conformational structure and enhanced properties compared to plant cellulose. Kombucha tea, a probiotic fermented sparkling beverage, produces a floating membrane that has been identified as bacterial cellulose as a side stream during this fermentation. The results shown in this review demonstrated the good performance of microbial biomass to form new materials, with enhanced functional properties for different applications.

Indexed as

bacterial cellulosebiobased materialsbiopolymer resourcesfungal biomasskombuchamicrobial biomassmilk kefir grainswater kefir grainsyeast biomass

Identifiers

PMID32168751
PMCPMC7143539
OpenAlexW3010684717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.