Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32168352›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Rapid diagnosis of periodontitis, a feasibility study using MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry.

Angéline Antezack, Hervé Chaudet, Hervé Tissot-Dupont, Philippe Brouqui, Virginie Monnet-Corti

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Angéline AntezackDepartment of Periodontology, Service of Odontology, AP-HM, UFR of Odontology, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France.
Hervé ChaudetAP-HM, IHU-Méditerranée Infection, Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, Institut Hospitalo-Universitaire Méditerranée Infection, MEPHI, Aix Marseille University, Marseille, France.
Hervé Tissot-DupontAP-HM, IHU-Méditerranée Infection, Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, Institut Hospitalo-Universitaire Méditerranée Infection, MEPHI, Aix Marseille University, Marseille, France.
Philippe BrouquiAP-HM, IHU-Méditerranée Infection, Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, Institut Hospitalo-Universitaire Méditerranée Infection, MEPHI, Aix Marseille University, Marseille, France.
Virginie Monnet-CortiDepartment of Periodontology, Service of Odontology, AP-HM, UFR of Odontology, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France.
Aix-Marseille Université · FRMéditerranée Infection Foundation · FRInstitut de Recherche pour le Développement · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe aim of the present study was to assess the feasibility and diagnostic contribution of protein profiling using MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry applied to saliva, gingival crevicular fluid (GCF) and dental plaque from periodontitis and healthy subjects. We hypothesized that rapid routine and blinded MALDI-TOF analysis could accurately classify these three types of samples according to periodontal state. MATERIALS AND

methodsUnstimulated saliva, GCF and dental plaque, collected from periodontitis subjects and healthy controls, were analyzed by MALDI-TOF MS. Based on the differentially expressed peaks between the two groups, diagnostic decision trees were built for each sample.

resultsAmong 141 patients (67 periodontitis and 74 healthy controls), the decision trees diagnosed periodontitis with a sensitivity = 70.3% (± 0.211) and a specificity = 77.8% (± 0.165) for saliva, a sensitivity = 79.6% (± 0.188) and a specificity = 75.7% (± 0.195) for GCF, and a sensitivity = 72.1% (± 0.202) and a specificity = 72.2% (± 0.195) for dental plaque. The sensitivity and specificity of the tests were improved to 100% (CI 95% = [0.91;1]) and 100% (CI 95% = [0.92;1]), respectively, when two samples were tested.

conclusionWe developed, for the first time, diagnostic tests based on protein profiles of saliva, GCF and dental plaque between periodontitis patients and healthy subjects. When at least 2 of these samples were tested, the best results were obtained.

Indexed as

Spectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-IonizationAdultFemaleGene Expression RegulationHumansMaleMiddle AgedPeriodontitisProteinsSalivaToothProteins

Identifiers

PMID32168352
PMCPMC7069628
OpenAlexW3012460963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.