ArticlePloS one2020
Learning supervised embeddings for large scale sequence comparisons.
Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predicting host tropism in influenza a viruses: insights from multi-segment nucleotide signatures.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Article
- Machine learning assessment of zoonotic potential in avian influenza viruses using PB2 segment.BMC genomics · 2025Article
- AutoCoV: tracking the early spread of COVID-19 in terms of the spatial and temporal patterns from embedding space by K-mer based deep learning.BMC bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Similarity-based search of sequence collections is a core task in bioinformatics, one dominated for most of the genomic era by exact and heuristic alignment-based algorithms. However, even efficient heuristics such as BLAST may not scale to the data sets now emerging, motivating a range of alignment-free alternatives exploiting the underlying lexical structure of each sequence. In this paper, we introduce two supervised approaches-SuperVec and SuperVecX-to learn sequence embeddings. These methods extend earlier Representation Learning (RepL) based methods to include class-related information for each sequence during training. Including class information ensures that related sequence fragments have proximal representations in the target space, better reflecting the structure of the domain. We show the quality of the embeddings learned through these methods on (i) sequence retrieval and (ii) classification tasks. We also propose an hierarchical tree-based approach specifically designed for the sequence retrieval problem. The resulting methods, which we term H-SuperVec or H-SuperVecX, according to their respective use of SuperVec or SuperVecX, learn embeddings across a range of feature spaces based on exclusive and exhaustive subsets of the class labels. Experiments show that the proposed methods perform better for retrieval and classification tasks over existing (unsupervised) RepL-based approaches. Further, the new methods are an order of magnitude faster than BLAST for the database retrieval task, supporting hybrid approaches that rapidly filter the collection so that only potentially relevant records remain. Such filtering of the original database allows slower but more accurate methods to be executed quickly over a far smaller dataset. Thus, we may achieve faster query processing and higher precision than before.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.