Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32168338›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Learning supervised embeddings for large scale sequence comparisons.

Dhananjay Kimothi, Pravesh Biyani, James M Hogan, Akshay Soni, Wayne Kelly

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dhananjay KimothiDepartment of ECE, Indraprastha Institute of Information Technology-Delhi, New Delhi, India.ORCID 0000-0002-2444-5229
Pravesh BiyaniDepartment of ECE, Indraprastha Institute of Information Technology-Delhi, New Delhi, India.
James M HoganSchool of Computer Science, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Akshay SoniMicrosoft, Sunnyvale, California, United States of America.
Wayne KellySchool of Computer Science, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Similarity-based search of sequence collections is a core task in bioinformatics, one dominated for most of the genomic era by exact and heuristic alignment-based algorithms. However, even efficient heuristics such as BLAST may not scale to the data sets now emerging, motivating a range of alignment-free alternatives exploiting the underlying lexical structure of each sequence. In this paper, we introduce two supervised approaches-SuperVec and SuperVecX-to learn sequence embeddings. These methods extend earlier Representation Learning (RepL) based methods to include class-related information for each sequence during training. Including class information ensures that related sequence fragments have proximal representations in the target space, better reflecting the structure of the domain. We show the quality of the embeddings learned through these methods on (i) sequence retrieval and (ii) classification tasks. We also propose an hierarchical tree-based approach specifically designed for the sequence retrieval problem. The resulting methods, which we term H-SuperVec or H-SuperVecX, according to their respective use of SuperVec or SuperVecX, learn embeddings across a range of feature spaces based on exclusive and exhaustive subsets of the class labels. Experiments show that the proposed methods perform better for retrieval and classification tasks over existing (unsupervised) RepL-based approaches. Further, the new methods are an order of magnitude faster than BLAST for the database retrieval task, supporting hybrid approaches that rapidly filter the collection so that only potentially relevant records remain. Such filtering of the original database allows slower but more accurate methods to be executed quickly over a far smaller dataset. Thus, we may achieve faster query processing and higher precision than before.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsMachine LearningSequence HomologyArea Under CurveDatabases, FactualTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID32168338
PMCPMC7069636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.