Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32168334›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2020

A fly model establishes distinct mechanisms for synthetic CRISPR/Cas9 sex distorters.

Barbara Fasulo, Angela Meccariello, Maya Morgan, Carl Borufka, Philippos Aris Papathanos, Nikolai Windbichler

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Natural and Engineered Sex Ratio Distortion in Insects.Frontiers in ecology and evolution · 2022
    Article
  16. Gene drives gaining speed.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2022
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Gene drive that results in addiction to a temperature-sensitive version of an essential gene triggers population collapse inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Barbara FasuloDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Sir Alexander Fleming Building, South Kensington Campus, London, United Kingdom.
Angela MeccarielloDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Sir Alexander Fleming Building, South Kensington Campus, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9706-5764
Maya MorganDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Sir Alexander Fleming Building, South Kensington Campus, London, United Kingdom.
Carl BorufkaDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Sir Alexander Fleming Building, South Kensington Campus, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8639-3586
Philippos Aris PapathanosDepartment of Entomology, Robert H. Smith Faculty of Agriculture, Food and Environment, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rehovot, Israel.ORCID 0000-0001-8508-4554
Nikolai WindbichlerDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Sir Alexander Fleming Building, South Kensington Campus, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9896-1165
Imperial College London · GBHebrew University of Jerusalem · IL

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/P000843/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Synthetic sex distorters have recently been developed in the malaria mosquito, relying on endonucleases that target the X-chromosome during spermatogenesis. Although inspired by naturally-occurring traits, it has remained unclear how they function and, given their potential for genetic control, how portable this strategy is across species. We established Drosophila models for two distinct mechanisms for CRISPR/Cas9 sex-ratio distortion-"X-shredding" and "X-poisoning"-and dissected their target-site requirements and repair dynamics. X-shredding resulted in sex distortion when Cas9 endonuclease activity occurred during the meiotic stages of spermatogenesis but not when Cas9 was expressed from the stem cell stages onwards. Our results suggest that X-shredding is counteracted by the NHEJ DNA repair pathway and can operate on a single repeat cluster of non-essential sequences, although the targeting of a number of such repeats had no effect on the sex ratio. X-poisoning by contrast, i.e. targeting putative haplolethal genes on the X chromosome, induced a high bias towards males (>92%) when we directed Cas9 cleavage to the X-linked ribosomal target gene RpS6. In the case of X-poisoning sex distortion was coupled to a loss in reproductive output, although a dominant-negative effect appeared to drive the mechanism of female lethality. These model systems will guide the study and the application of sex distorters to medically or agriculturally important insect target species.

Indexed as

AnimalsCRISPR-Cas SystemsDNA End-Joining RepairDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsEndonucleasesFemaleGene EditingMaleModels, AnimalPest Control, BiologicalSex Determination ProcessesSex PreselectionSex RatioSpermatogenesisX ChromosomeDrosophila ProteinsEndonucleases

Identifiers

PMID32168334
PMCPMC7108745
OpenAlexW3010928026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.