ArticleSexually transmitted diseases2020
For Human Papillomavirus Self-Sampling, Stated Willingness Does Not Correspond With Subsequent Uptake by Rural Malawian Women.
Article in Sexually transmitted diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cervical Cancer Screening Among Women in Malawi: An Integrative Literature Review.Oncology nursing forum · 2025Review
- Barriers and Opportunities for HPV Self-Sampling in Underserved Rural Communities: Insights from a Mixed Methods Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
- For girls and women (4GW) HPV RCT protocol: a crowdsourced, pragmatic stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial to improve uptake of HPV vaccination and screening among mother-daughter dyads in Nigeria.Implementation science : IS · 2025Article
- Scoping review on the perceptions and attitude of women on methods for collecting cervicovaginal samples for Human Papillomavirus testing in Sub-Saharan Africa.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
- Article
- Human papillomavirus self-sampling versus provider-sampling in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review of accuracy, acceptability, cost, uptake, and equity.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHuman papilloma virus (HPV), the causative agent for cervical cancer, can be tested for using self-collected vaginal samples. Self-collection is promising for HPV screening in hard-to-reach populations. To assess the relationship between willingness to self-collect and subsequent uptake of self-collection, we conducted a longitudinal study of reproductive-age women in rural Malawi.
methodsAt baseline, we asked women if they would be willing to self-collect a vaginal sample for HPV testing. At follow-up (12-18 months later), we offered the same women the opportunity to self-collect a sample for HPV testing. We examined unadjusted and adjusted associations between baseline willingness to self-collect a sample for HPV testing and uptake of self-collection at follow-up using log-binomial models.
resultsAmong 122 women who, at baseline, indicated willingness to self-collect, n = 65 (53%) agreed to self-collect a sample at follow-up. Of 64 women who stated unwillingness at baseline to self-collect, n = 30 (47%) self-collected a sample for testing at follow-up. We observed no association between women's willingness at baseline and their observed self-collection decision at follow-up (unadjusted prevalence ratio, 1.14; 95% confidence interval, 0.83-1.55). The association remained null after adjustment for age, awareness of cervical cancer, and perceived behavioral control.
conclusionsOur results suggest that evaluation of acceptability of self-collection should go beyond simply asking women if they would be willing to self-collect a vaginal sample. Given that half of this study's participants agreed to self-collect a sample when the opportunity was offered, regardless of their previously stated preferences, self-collection should be offered to everyone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.