Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32168174›Full record

ArticleSexually transmitted diseases2020

High-risk Human Papillomavirus Messenger RNA Testing in Wet and Dry Self-collected Specimens for High-grade Cervical Lesion Detection in Mombasa, Kenya.

Jessica Yasmine Islam, Michael M Mutua, Emmanuel Kabare, Griffins Manguro, Michael G Hudgens, Charles Poole, Andrew F Olshan, Stephanie B Wheeler, R Scott McClelland, Jennifer S Smith

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sexually transmitted diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Jessica Yasmine Islam
Michael M MutuaInstitute of Tropical and Infectious Diseases, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.
Emmanuel KabareInstitute of Tropical and Infectious Diseases, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.
Griffins ManguroInstitute of Tropical and Infectious Diseases, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.
Michael G HudgensDepartments of Biostatistics.
Charles PooleFrom the Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health.
Andrew F Olshan
Stephanie B Wheeler
R Scott McClelland
Jennifer S Smith
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of Nairobi · KECancer Research And Biostatistics · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Virology Research Program (Program 4)P30CA016086 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Deborah F. Tate · 1985 to 2026
$201.5M
Assessing clinical validity of cervical cancer self-screening methodsF31CA210474 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ISLAM, JESSICA YASMINE · 2017 to 2018
$72k
NCI NIH HHS F31 CA210474NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016086
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSelf-collection for high-risk human papillomavirus (hr-HPV) messenger RNA (mRNA) testing may improve cervical cancer screening. High-risk HPV mRNA with self-collected specimens stored dry could enhance feasibility and acceptance of specimen collection and storage; however, its performance is unknown. We compared the performance of hr-HPV mRNA testing with dry- as compared with wet-stored self-collected specimens for detecting high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion or more severe (≥HSIL).

methodsA total of 400 female sex workers in Kenya participated (2013-2018), of which 50% were HIV positive based on enrollment procedures. Participants provided 2 self-collected specimens: one stored dry (sc-DRY) using a Viba brush (Rovers) and one stored wet (sc-WET) with Aptima media (Hologic) using an Evalyn brush (Rovers). Physician-collected specimens were collected for HPV mRNA testing (Aptima) and conventional cytology. We estimated test characteristics for each hr-HPV screening method using conventional cytology as the reference standard (≥HSIL detection). We also examined participant preference for sc-DRY and sc-WET collection.

resultsHigh-risk HPV mRNA positivity was higher in sc-WET (36.8%) than sc-DRY samples (31.8%). Prevalence of ≥HSIL was 6.9% (10.3% HIV positive, 4.0% HIV negative). Sensitivity of hr-HPV mRNA for detecting ≥HSIL was similar in sc-WET (85%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 66%-96%), sc-DRY specimens (78%; 95% CI, 58%-91%), and physician-collected specimens (93%; 95% CI, 76%-99%). Overall, the specificity of hr-HPV mRNA for ≥HSIL detection was similar when comparing sc-WET with physician collection. However, specificity was lower for sc-WET (66% [61%-71%]) than sc-DRY (71% [66%-76%]). Women preferred sc-DRY specimen collection (46.1%) compared with sc-WET (31.1%). However, more women preferred physician collection (63.9%) compared with self-collection (36.1%).

conclusionsSelf-collected stored-dry specimens seemed to perform similarly to sc-WET for the detection of ≥HSIL.

Indexed as

Papillomavirus InfectionsSex WorkersAdultAgedCohort StudiesEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansKenyaMiddle AgedPapillomaviridaePregnancyRNA, MessengerSensitivity and SpecificitySpecimen HandlingUterine Cervical DysplasiaRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID32168174
PMCPMC7837412
OpenAlexW3011773022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.