Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32167763›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2020

Fragment Pose Prediction Using Non-equilibrium Candidate Monte Carlo and Molecular Dynamics Simulations.

Nathan M Lim, Meghan Osato, Gregory L Warren, David L Mobley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. How many crystal structures do you need to trust your docking results?bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. An overview of the SAMPL8 host-guest binding challenge.Journal of computer-aided molecular design · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nathan M LimDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California-Irvine, Irvine, California 92697, United States.
Meghan OsatoDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California-Irvine, Irvine, California 92697, United States.
Gregory L WarrenOpenEye Scientific Software, Santa Fe, New Mexico 87508, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4017-0162
David L MobleyDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California-Irvine, Irvine, California 92697, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1083-5533

Funding

Computational alchemy for molecular design and optimizationR01GM108889 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI MOBLEY, DAVID LOWELL · 2014 to 2022
$2.5M
Advancing predictive physical modeling through focused development of model systems to drive new modeling innovationsR01GM124270 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI MOBLEY, DAVID LOWELL · 2018 to 2021
$1.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM108889NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM124270
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Part of early stage drug discovery involves determining how molecules may bind to the target protein. Through understanding where and how molecules bind, chemists can begin to build ideas on how to design improvements to increase binding affinities. In this retrospective study, we compare how computational approaches like docking, molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, and a non-equilibrium candidate Monte Carlo (NCMC)-based method (NCMC + MD) perform in predicting binding modes for a set of 12 fragment-like molecules, which bind to soluble epoxide hydrolase. We evaluate each method's effectiveness in identifying the dominant binding mode and finding additional binding modes (if any). Then, we compare our predicted binding modes to experimentally obtained X-ray crystal structures. We dock each of the 12 small molecules into the apo-protein crystal structure and then run simulations up to 1 μs each. Small and fragment-like molecules likely have smaller energy barriers separating different binding modes by virtue of relatively fewer and weaker interactions relative to drug-like molecules and thus likely undergo more rapid binding mode transitions. We expect, thus, to see more rapid transitions between binding modes in our study. Following this, we build Markov State Models to define our stable ligand binding modes. We investigate if adequate sampling of ligand binding modes and transitions between them can occur at the microsecond timescale using traditional MD or a hybrid NCMC+MD simulation approach. Our findings suggest that even with small fragment-like molecules, we fail to sample all the crystallographic binding modes using microsecond MD simulations, but using NCMC+MD, we have better success in sampling the crystal structure while obtaining the correct populations.

Indexed as

Epoxide HydrolasesMolecular Docking SimulationMolecular Dynamics SimulationMonte Carlo MethodProtein BindingEpoxide Hydrolases

Identifiers

PMID32167763
PMCPMC7325745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.