ArticleThe Medical journal of Australia2020
Australia needs to increase testing to achieve hepatitis C elimination.
Article in The Medical journal of Australia, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
39 citing papers in PubMed.
- C no more: a prospective single-arm study to evaluate the effectiveness of a nurse and peer-led mobile model of hepatitis C testing and treatment at community corrections offices.Health & justice · 2026Article
- The Hepatitis C Cascade of Care for Opioid Agonist Therapy Recipients in Australia.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2026Article
- A Costing Analysis of a Nurse- and Peer-Led Mobile Model of Hepatitis C Care Adjacent to the Community Corrections Setting.Open forum infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Sustaining policy promise: rhetorics of disease elimination and sustainable development.Medical humanities · 2026Article
- The Journey to Hepatitis C Elimination in Taiwan: Insights From the Hemodialysis Population.Open forum infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Treatment outcomes for people with hepatitis C referred to tertiary care in Victoria, 2021-22: a retrospective observational study.The Medical journal of Australia · 2025Article
- Review
- HIV, STI, and Hepatitis Among People Who Inject Drugs at a Sexual Health Clinic in Melbourne, Australia: 2012 to 2022.Open forum infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Prescribing direct-acting antivirals for hepatitis C treatment: a scoping review of factors that influence primary care providers.BMC primary care · 2025Article
- Cost-Effectiveness of Treating Hepatitis C in Clients on Opioid Agonist Therapy in Community Pharmacies Compared to Primary Healthcare in Australia.Journal of viral hepatitis · 2025Article
- Road to Hepatitis C Elimination in Israel: Improvements in Linkage to Care (2009-2020).Advances in therapy · 2025Article
- Progress Toward Hepatitis C Virus Elimination among People Living with HIV-Hepatitis C Virus Coinfection in Canada.Canadian liver journal · 2025Article
- Impact and cost-effectiveness of scaling up HCV testing and treatment strategies for achieving HCV elimination among people who inject drugs in England: a mathematical modelling study.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2025Article
- Australian Community Pharmacists' Preparedness to Offer and Discuss Hepatitis C Testing and Treatment With Pharmacy Clients: A Representative Cross-Sectional Survey.Journal of viral hepatitis · 2025Article
- Article
- Post-Diagnosis HCV RNA Testing Rates Prior to HCV Treatment Among People Living With HIV With HCV Antibody Positivity in the Asia-Pacific Region.Journal of viral hepatitis · 2024Article
- Contribution of prison-based hepatitis C treatment initiations to overall treatment uptake in Victoria, Australia.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2024Article
- Missed Opportunities: A Retrospective Study of Hepatitis C Testing in Hospital Inpatients.Viruses · 2024Article
- Article
- In search of a 'good number': knowledge controversy and population estimates in the endgame of hepatitis C elimination.BMJ global health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo assess progress in Australia toward the 2030 WHO hepatitis C elimination targets two years after the introduction of highly effective direct-acting antiviral (DAA) treatments.
designAnalysis of quarterly data on government-subsidised hepatitis C RNA testing and hepatitis C treatment in Australia, January 2013 - June 2018. Changes in testing and treatment levels associated with DAA availability were assessed in an autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) statistical model, and the impact by 2030 of different levels of testing and treatment were estimated using a mathematical model. MAJOR OUTCOME MEASURES: Hepatitis C prevalence among people who inject drugs; annual hepatitis C incidence relative to 2015 levels; projections for the hepatitis C care cascade in 2030.
resultsThe mean annual number of treatments initiated for people with hepatitis C increased from 6747 during 2013-2015 (before the introduction of DAAs) to 28 022 during 2016-18; the mean annual number of diagnostic RNA tests increased from 17 385 to 23 819. If current trends in testing and treatment continue (ie, 2018 testing numbers are maintained but treatment numbers decline by 50%), it is projected that by 2030 only 72% of infected people would be treated (by 2025 all people diagnosed with hepatitis C would be treated). The incidence of hepatitis C in 2030 would be 59% lower than in 2015, well short of the WHO target of an 80% reduction. The identification and testing of people exposed to hepatitis C must be increased by at least 50% for Australia to reach the WHO elimination targets.
conclusionHepatitis C elimination programs in Australia should focus on increasing testing rates and linkage with care to maintain adequate levels of treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.