Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32167267›Full record

ArticleJournal of psychiatry & neuroscience : JPN2020

Frontoparietal and salience network alterations in obsessive–compulsive disorder: insights from independent component and sliding time window analyses

Deniz A. Gürsel, Lena Reinholz, Benno Bremer, Benita Schmitz-Koep, Nicolai Franzmeier, Mihai Avram, Kathrin Koch

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of psychiatry & neuroscience : JPN, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. EEG microstate co-specificity in schizophrenia and obsessive-compulsive disorder.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Deniz A. GürselFrom the Department of Neuroradiology, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Ismaningerstrasse 22, 81675 Munich, Germany (Gürsel, Bremer, Schmitz-Koep, Avram, Koch); the TUM-Neuroimaging Center (TUM-NIC), Technical University of Munich, Einsteinstr. 1, 81675 Munich, Germany (Gürsel, Avram); the Department of Psychology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, 80802, Germany (Reinholz); and the Institute for Stroke and Dementia Research, Klinikum der Universität München, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität LMU, Feodor-Lynen Straße 17, 81377, Munich, Germany (Franzmeier).
Lena ReinholzFrom the Department of Neuroradiology, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Ismaningerstrasse 22, 81675 Munich, Germany (Gürsel, Bremer, Schmitz-Koep, Avram, Koch); the TUM-Neuroimaging Center (TUM-NIC), Technical University of Munich, Einsteinstr. 1, 81675 Munich, Germany (Gürsel, Avram); the Department of Psychology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, 80802, Germany (Reinholz); and the Institute for Stroke and Dementia Research, Klinikum der Universität München, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität LMU, Feodor-Lynen Straße 17, 81377, Munich, Germany (Franzmeier).
Benno BremerFrom the Department of Neuroradiology, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Ismaningerstrasse 22, 81675 Munich, Germany (Gürsel, Bremer, Schmitz-Koep, Avram, Koch); the TUM-Neuroimaging Center (TUM-NIC), Technical University of Munich, Einsteinstr. 1, 81675 Munich, Germany (Gürsel, Avram); the Department of Psychology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, 80802, Germany (Reinholz); and the Institute for Stroke and Dementia Research, Klinikum der Universität München, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität LMU, Feodor-Lynen Straße 17, 81377, Munich, Germany (Franzmeier).
Benita Schmitz-KoepFrom the Department of Neuroradiology, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Ismaningerstrasse 22, 81675 Munich, Germany (Gürsel, Bremer, Schmitz-Koep, Avram, Koch); the TUM-Neuroimaging Center (TUM-NIC), Technical University of Munich, Einsteinstr. 1, 81675 Munich, Germany (Gürsel, Avram); the Department of Psychology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, 80802, Germany (Reinholz); and the Institute for Stroke and Dementia Research, Klinikum der Universität München, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität LMU, Feodor-Lynen Straße 17, 81377, Munich, Germany (Franzmeier).
Nicolai FranzmeierFrom the Department of Neuroradiology, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Ismaningerstrasse 22, 81675 Munich, Germany (Gürsel, Bremer, Schmitz-Koep, Avram, Koch); the TUM-Neuroimaging Center (TUM-NIC), Technical University of Munich, Einsteinstr. 1, 81675 Munich, Germany (Gürsel, Avram); the Department of Psychology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, 80802, Germany (Reinholz); and the Institute for Stroke and Dementia Research, Klinikum der Universität München, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität LMU, Feodor-Lynen Straße 17, 81377, Munich, Germany (Franzmeier).
Mihai AvramFrom the Department of Neuroradiology, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Ismaningerstrasse 22, 81675 Munich, Germany (Gürsel, Bremer, Schmitz-Koep, Avram, Koch); the TUM-Neuroimaging Center (TUM-NIC), Technical University of Munich, Einsteinstr. 1, 81675 Munich, Germany (Gürsel, Avram); the Department of Psychology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, 80802, Germany (Reinholz); and the Institute for Stroke and Dementia Research, Klinikum der Universität München, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität LMU, Feodor-Lynen Straße 17, 81377, Munich, Germany (Franzmeier).
Kathrin KochFrom the Department of Neuroradiology, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Ismaningerstrasse 22, 81675 Munich, Germany (Gürsel, Bremer, Schmitz-Koep, Avram, Koch); the TUM-Neuroimaging Center (TUM-NIC), Technical University of Munich, Einsteinstr. 1, 81675 Munich, Germany (Gürsel, Avram); the Department of Psychology, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, 80802, Germany (Reinholz); and the Institute for Stroke and Dementia Research, Klinikum der Universität München, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität LMU, Feodor-Lynen Straße 17, 81377, Munich, Germany (Franzmeier).
Technical University of Munich · DEKlinikum rechts der Isar · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Resting-state functional MRI (fMRI) studies commonly report alterations in 3 core networks in obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD) — the frontoparietal network, the default mode network and the salience network — defined by functionally connected infraslow oscillations in ongoing brain activity. However, most of these studies observed static functional connectivity in the brains of patients with OCD. Methods: To investigate dynamic functional connectivity alterations and widen the evidence base toward the triple network model in OCD, we performed group-based independent component and sliding time window analyses in 49 patients with OCD and 41 healthy controls. Results: The traditional independent component analysis showed alterations in the left frontoparietal network as well as between the left and right frontoparietal networks in patients with OCD compared with healthy controls. For dynamic functional connectivity, the sliding time window approach revealed peak dysconnectivity between the left and right frontoparietal networks and between the left frontoparietal network and the salience network. Limitations: The number of independent components, noise in the resting-state fMRI images, the heterogeneity of the OCD sample, and comorbidities and medication status in the patients could have biased the results. Conclusion: Disrupted modulation of these intrinsic brain networks may contribute to the pathophysiology of OCD.

Indexed as

AdultBrainCase-Control StudiesFemaleFrontal LobeFunctional NeuroimagingHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNeural PathwaysObsessive-Compulsive DisorderParietal LobeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID32167267
PMCPMC7828976
OpenAlexW3011573814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.