Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32167180›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical virology2020

The establishment of reference sequence for SARS-CoV-2 and variation analysis.

Changtai Wang, Zhongping Liu, Zixiang Chen, Xin Huang, Mengyuan Xu, Tengfei He, Zhenhua Zhang

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical virology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 261 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
261citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
13.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

261 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 549 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

201 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Changtai WangDepartment of Infectious Diseases, The Second Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Zhongping LiuDepartment of Infectious Diseases, The Second Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Zixiang ChenInstitute of Clinical Virology, The Second Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Xin HuangInstitute of Clinical Virology, The Second Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Mengyuan XuDepartment of Infectious Diseases, The Second Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Tengfei HeDepartment of Infectious Diseases, The Second Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Zhenhua ZhangDepartment of Infectious Diseases, The Second Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8480-9004
Anhui Medical University · CN

Funding

Anhui Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China 1608085MH162Emergency Science and Technology Plan for Novel Coronavirus Infection of Anqing 2020Z1001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Starting around December 2019, an epidemic of pneumonia, which was named COVID-19 by the World Health Organization, broke out in Wuhan, China, and is spreading throughout the world. A new coronavirus, named severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) by the Coronavirus Study Group of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses was soon found to be the cause. At present, the sensitivity of clinical nucleic acid detection is limited, and it is still unclear whether it is related to genetic variation. In this study, we retrieved 95 full-length genomic sequences of SARAS-CoV-2 strains from the National Center for Biotechnology Information and GISAID databases, established the reference sequence by conducting multiple sequence alignment and phylogenetic analyses, and analyzed sequence variations along the SARS-CoV-2 genome. The homology among all viral strains was generally high, among them, 99.99% (99.91%-100%) at the nucleotide level and 99.99% (99.79%-100%) at the amino acid level. Although overall variation in open-reading frame (ORF) regions is low, 13 variation sites in 1a, 1b, S, 3a, M, 8, and N regions were identified, among which positions nt28144 in ORF 8 and nt8782 in ORF 1a showed mutation rate of 30.53% (29/95) and 29.47% (28/95), respectively. These findings suggested that there may be selective mutations in SARS-COV-2, and it is necessary to avoid certain regions when designing primers and probes. Establishment of the reference sequence for SARS-CoV-2 could benefit not only biological study of this virus but also diagnosis, clinical monitoring and intervention of SARS-CoV-2 infection in the future.

Indexed as

Genome, ViralMutation RatePandemicsBase SequenceBetacoronavirusClinical Laboratory TechniquesCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19COVID-19 TestingDatabases, GeneticHumansOpen Reading FramesPhylogenyPneumonia, ViralReference StandardsRNA, ViralRNA, Viralhomologynucleotidereference sequenceSARS-CoV-2variation

Identifiers

PMID32167180
PMCPMC7228400
OpenAlexW3010795344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.