Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32167160›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of cancer2020

Ovarian cancer-derived copy number alterations signatures are prognostic in chemoradiotherapy-treated head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Paul B M Essers, Martijn van der Heijden, David Vossen, Reinout H de Roest, C René Leemans, Ruud H Brakenhoff, Michiel W M van den Brekel, Harry Bartelink, Marcel Verheij, Conchita Vens

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Paul B M EssersDivision of Cell Biology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Martijn van der HeijdenDivision of Cell Biology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
David VossenDivision of Cell Biology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Reinout H de RoestAmsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
C René LeemansAmsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ruud H BrakenhoffAmsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Michiel W M van den BrekelDepartment of Head and Neck Oncology and Surgery, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Harry BartelinkDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Marcel VerheijDivision of Cell Biology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Conchita VensDivision of Cell Biology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8608-7236
The Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA copy number alterations (CNAs) are frequent in cancer, and recently developed CNA signatures revealed their value in molecular tumor stratification for patient prognosis and platinum resistance prediction in ovarian cancer. Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is also characterized by high CNAs. In this study, we determined CNA in 173 human papilloma virus-negative HNSCC from a Dutch multicenter cohort by low-coverage whole genome sequencing and tested the prognostic value of seven cancer-derived CNA signatures for these cisplatin- and radiotherapy-treated patients. We find that a high CNA signature 1 (s1) score is associated with low values for all other signatures and better patient outcomes in the Dutch cohorts and The Cancer Genome Atlas HNSCC data set. High s5 and s7 scores are associated with increased distant metastasis rates and high s6 scores with poor overall survival. High cumulative cisplatin doses result in improved outcomes in chemoradiotherapy-treated HNSCC patients. Here we find that tumors high in s1 or low in s6 are most responsive to a change in cisplatin dose. High s5 values, however, significantly increase the risk for metastasis in patients with low cumulative cisplatin doses. Together this suggests that the processes causing these CNA signatures affect cisplatin response in HNSCC. In conclusion, CNA signatures derived from a different cancer type were prognostic and associated with cisplatin response in HNSCC, suggesting they represent underlying molecular processes that define patient outcome.

Indexed as

ChemoradiotherapyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorBiopsyCisplatinDatasets as TopicDNA Copy Number VariationsDrug Resistance, NeoplasmFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGene Expression ProfilingHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateBiomarkers, TumorCisplatinchemoradiotherapycisplatincopy number alterationshead and neck squamous cell carcinomaHNSCCprognosis

Identifiers

PMID32167160
PMCPMC7496441
OpenAlexW3011898120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.