Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32166830›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2020

Putative protective neural mechanisms in prereaders with a family history of dyslexia who subsequently develop typical reading skills.

Xi Yu, Jennifer Zuk, Meaghan V Perdue, Ola Ozernov-Palchik, Talia Raney, Sara D Beach, Elizabeth S Norton, Yangming Ou, John D E Gabrieli, Nadine Gaab

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Longitudinal trajectories of brain development from infancy to school age and their relationship with literacy development.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Reflections on the past two decades of Mind, Brain, and Education.Mind, brain and education : the official journal of the International Mind, Brain, and Education Society · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Xi YuState Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0818-1451
Jennifer ZukLaboratories of Cognitive Neuroscience, Division of Developmental Medicine, Department of Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Meaghan V PerdueLaboratories of Cognitive Neuroscience, Division of Developmental Medicine, Department of Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6113-9175
Ola Ozernov-PalchikLaboratories of Cognitive Neuroscience, Division of Developmental Medicine, Department of Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0055-6642
Talia RaneyLaboratories of Cognitive Neuroscience, Division of Developmental Medicine, Department of Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Sara D BeachMcGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Elizabeth S NortonDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4023-8051
Yangming OuDivision of Newborn Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7726-6208
John D E GabrieliMcGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Nadine GaabLaboratories of Cognitive Neuroscience, Division of Developmental Medicine, Department of Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7548-413X
Boston Children's Hospital · USHarvard University · USMcGovern Institute for Brain Research · USNorthwestern University · US

Funding

TRAINING FOR SPEECH AND HEARING SCIENCEST32DC000038 · NIDCD · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI Gwenaelle S Geleoc · 1992 to 2026
$21.8M
Longitudinal Study of childhood fMRI markers prior to reading onsetR01HD065762 · NICHD · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI GAAB, NADINE, GRANT, PATRICIA ELLEN · 2011 to 2021
$6.3M
Using Cognitive Neuroscience to Predict Dyslexia among Kindergarden ChildrenR01HD067312 · NICHD · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI GAAB, NADINE, GABRIELI, JOHN · 2011 to 2015
$3.1M
Examining behavioral and neural links between speech delay and literacy skillsF31DC015919 · NIDCD · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI ZUK, JENNIFER MARGARET · 2016 to 2016
$31k
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD065762NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD067312NIDCD NIH HHS F31 DC015919NIDCD NIH HHS T32 DC000038
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Developmental dyslexia affects 40-60% of children with a familial risk (FHD+) compared to a general prevalence of 5-10%. Despite the increased risk, about half of FHD+ children develop typical reading abilities (FHD+Typical). Yet the underlying neural characteristics of favorable reading outcomes in at-risk children remain unknown. Utilizing a retrospective, longitudinal approach, this study examined whether putative protective neural mechanisms can be observed in FHD+Typical at the prereading stage. Functional and structural brain characteristics were examined in 47 FHD+ prereaders who subsequently developed typical (n = 35) or impaired (n = 12) reading abilities and 34 controls (FHD-Typical). Searchlight-based multivariate pattern analyses identified distinct activation patterns during phonological processing between FHD+Typical and FHD-Typical in right inferior frontal gyrus (RIFG) and left temporo-parietal cortex (LTPC) regions. Follow-up analyses on group-specific classification patterns demonstrated LTPC hypoactivation in FHD+Typical compared to FHD-Typical, suggesting this neural characteristic as an FHD+ phenotype. In contrast, RIFG showed hyperactivation in FHD+Typical than FHD-Typical, and its activation pattern was positively correlated with subsequent reading abilities in FHD+ but not controls (FHD-Typical). RIFG hyperactivation in FHD+Typical was further associated with increased interhemispheric functional and structural connectivity. These results suggest that some protective neural mechanisms are already established in FHD+Typical prereaders supporting their typical reading development.

Indexed as

BrainConnectomeDiffusion Tensor ImagingDyslexiaReadingChildChild DevelopmentChild, PreschoolFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansLanguage DevelopmentLongitudinal StudiesMaleRetrospective Studieschildrendevelopmental dyslexiaDTIfunctional MRIpediatric neuroimaging

Identifiers

PMID32166830
PMCPMC7294063
OpenAlexW3011931192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.