Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32166761›Full record

ArticleHealth services research2020

The effect of Medicaid expansion on use of opioid agonist treatment and the role of provider capacity constraints.

Alex K Gertner, Allison G Robertson, Hendree Jones, Byron J Powell, Pam Silberman, Marisa E Domino

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health services research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alex K GertnerDepartment of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.ORCID 0000-0001-7781-3681
Allison G RobertsonDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Hendree JonesDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Carrboro, North Carolina.
Byron J PowellBrown School, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri.
Pam SilbermanDepartment of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Marisa E DominoDepartment of Health Policy and Management, University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

Funding

IMPROVING THE IMPLEMENTATION AND SUSTAINMENT OF EBPS IN MENTAL HEALTH: DEVELOPING AND PILOTING THE COLLABORATIVE ORGANIZATIONAL APPROACH TO SELECTING AND TAILORING IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES (COAST-ISK01MH113806 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI POWELL, BYRON JAMES · 2017 to 2020
$697k
Utilization and Access to Buprenorphine Treatment for Opioid Use Disorder in MedicaidF30DA044668 · NIDA · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI GERTNER, ALEX · 2018 to 2022
$176k
NIDA NIH HHS F30 DA044668NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH113806
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the effect of Medicaid expansion on the use of opioid agonist treatment for opioid use disorder (OUD) and to examine heterogeneous effects by provider supply and Medicaid acceptance rates. DATA SOURCES: Yearly state-level data on methadone dispensed from opioid treatment programs (OTPs), buprenorphine dispensed from OTPs and pharmacies, number of OTPs and buprenorphine-waivered providers, and percent of OTPs and physicians accepting Medicaid. STUDY

designThis study used difference-in-differences models to examine the effect of Medicaid expansion on the amount of methadone and buprenorphine dispensed in states between 2006 and 2017. Interaction terms were used to estimate heterogeneous effects. Sensitivity analyses included testing the association of outcomes with Medicaid enrollment and state insurance rates. PRINCIPAL

findingsThe estimated effects of Medicaid expansion on buprenorphine and methadone dispensed were positive but imprecise, meaning we could not rule out negative or null effects of expansion. The estimated associations between state insurance rates and dispensed methadone and buprenorphine were centered near zero, suggesting that improvements in health coverage may not have increased OUD treatment use. The effect of Medicaid expansion was larger in the states with the most waivered providers compared to states with the fewest waivered providers. In the states with the most waivered providers, the average estimated effect of expansion on buprenorphine dispensed was 12 kg/y, enough to treat about 7500 individuals. We did not find evidence that the effect of expansion was consistently modified by OTP concentration, OTP Medicaid acceptance, or physician Medicaid acceptance.

conclusionsGains in health coverage may not be sufficient to increase OUD treatment, even in the context of high treatment need. Provider capacity likely limited Medicaid expansion's effect on buprenorphine dispensed. Policies to increase buprenorphine providers, such as ending the waiver requirement, may be needed to ensure coverage gains translate to treatment access.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidBuprenorphineHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMedicaidMethadoneOpiate Substitution TreatmentOpioid-Related DisordersPatient Protection and Affordable Care ActPhysiciansSocioeconomic FactorsUnited StatesAnalgesics, OpioidBuprenorphineMethadonebuprenorphineMedicaid expansionmethadoneopioid use disorder

Identifiers

PMID32166761
PMCPMC7240768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.