ArticleLa Radiologia medica2020
Efficacy of non-rigid registration technique for misregistration in 3D-CTA fusion imaging.
Article in La Radiologia medica, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Influence of standardized breath-holding instruction and practice on craniocaudal misregistration between the arterial and venous phases in preoperative abdominal contrast-enhanced computed tomography.Radiological physics and technology · 2026Article
- Article
- Structured Reporting in Radiological Settings: Pitfalls and Perspectives.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Review
- Comparison between two packages for pectoral muscle removal on mammographic images.La Radiologia medica · 2022Article
- Precision Imaging Guidance in the Era of Precision Oncology: An Update of Imaging Tools for Interventional Procedures.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Assessment of Ablative Margin After Microwave Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using Deep Learning-Based Deformable Image Registration.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo assess whether fusion 3D-CTA images can be corrected using non-rigid registration (NRR) for gastroenterology imaging.
methodsThis study included 55 patients before gastroenterology surgery who underwent preoperative 3D-CTA prior to gastroenterological surgery. We recorded the coordinate of measurement points on the arterial vessels (X, Y, and Z) in each portal phase, original image of the arterial phase, and arterial phase with NRR. The distance of misregistration between the two points was calculated with the coordinate of the original image with NRR and that of the portal phase as true value.
resultsThe distance of misregistration between the two points in the original arterial and portal phase images was significantly higher than that in the arterial phase image with NRR on all directions (p < 0.01).
conclusionsThis study showed that NRR may correct misregistration on fusion 3D-CTA imaging. Hence, it can visualize correctly the anatomy of the vessel.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.