ArticleEJNMMI physics2020
Image quality analysis of
Article in EJNMMI physics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of the dosimetry of scandium-43 and scandium-44 patient organ doses in relation to commonly used gallium-68 for imaging neuroendocrine tumours.EJNMMI physics · 2024Article
- Scandium Radioisotopes-Toward New Targets and Imaging Modalities.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Engineering a modularEJNMMI research · 2023Article
- Recent Advances in the Development of Tetrazine Ligation Tools for Pretargeted Nuclear Imaging.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Review
- Separation ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Fifty Shades of Scandium: Comparative Study of PET Capabilities Using Sc-43 and Sc-44 with Respect to Conventional Clinical Radionuclides.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Recent Advances in the Clinical Translation of Silicon Fluoride Acceptor (SiFA)Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Performance of nanoScan PET/CT and PET/MR for quantitative imaging ofEJNMMI research · 2021Article
- Production of scandium radionuclides for theranostic applications: towards standardization of quality requirements.EJNMMI radiopharmacy and chemistry · 2021Review
- Diagnosis of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma by Immuno-Positron Emission Tomography.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
- Dual-Time Point [Cancers · 2020Article
- Prostate Cancer Theranostics - An Overview.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Review
- Spatial resolution and image quality of radionuclides for PET imaging.Nuclear medicine and biologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background
resultsDespite the presence of high-energy γ-rays in
conclusionBased on these findings,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.