Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32166501›Full record

SynthesisJournal of medical systems2020

Graph-Representation of Patient Data: a Systematic Literature Review.

Jens Schrodt, Aleksei Dudchenko, Petra Knaup-Gregori, Matthias Ganzinger

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of medical systems, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jens SchrodtInstitute for Medical Biometry and Informatics, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9768-4781
Aleksei DudchenkoInstitute for Medical Biometry and Informatics, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4717-2307
Petra Knaup-GregoriInstitute for Medical Biometry and Informatics, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Matthias GanzingerInstitute for Medical Biometry and Informatics, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 130.3, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany. matthias.ganzinger@med.uni-heidelberg.de.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2716-5425

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 01ZX1609A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Graph theory is a well-established theory with many methods used in mathematics to study graph structures. In the field of medicine, electronic health records (EHR) are commonly used to store and analyze patient data. Consequently, it seems straight-forward to perform research on modeling EHR data as graphs. This systematic literature review aims to investigate the frontiers of the current research in the field of graphs representing and processing patient data. We want to show, which areas of research in this context need further investigation. The databases MEDLINE, Web of Science, IEEE Xplore and ACM digital library were queried by using the search terms health record, graph and related terms. Based on the "Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis" (PRISMA) statement guidelines the articles were screened and evaluated using full-text analysis. Eleven out of 383 articles found in systematic literature review were finally included for analysis in this literature review. Most of them use graphs to represent temporal relations, often representing the connection among laboratory data points. Only two papers report that the graph data were further processed by comparing the patient graphs using similarity measurements. Graphs representing individual patients are hardly used in research context, only eleven papers considered such kind of graphs in their investigations. The potential of graph theoretical algorithms, which are already well established, could help increasing this research field, but currently there are too few papers to estimate how this area of research will develop. Altogether, the use of such patient graphs could be a promising technique to develop decision support systems for diagnosis, medication or therapy of patients using similarity measurements or different kinds of analysis.

Indexed as

Computer GraphicsElectronic Health RecordsElectronic Data ProcessingElectronic health recordGraph theorySystematic literature reviewTemporal patient graph

Identifiers

PMID32166501
PMCPMC7067737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.