Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32166379›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2020

Effects of copper oxide nanoparticles on growth of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) seedlings and possible implications of nitric oxide in their antioxidative defense.

Milena Trevisan Pelegrino, Marcio Yukihiro Kohatsu, Amedea Barozzi Seabra, Lucilena Rebelo Monteiro, Diego Genuário Gomes, Halley Caixeta Oliveira, Wallace Rosado Rolim, Tatiane Araújo de Jesus, Bruno Lemos Batista, Camila Neves Lange

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 114 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Heliyon · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Screening of NativeMicroorganisms · 2023
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Milena Trevisan PelegrinoCentro de Ciências Naturais e Humanas, Universidade Federal do ABC (UFABC), Santo Andre, SP, Brazil.
Marcio Yukihiro KohatsuCentro de Engenharia, Modelagem e Ciências Sociais Aplicadas, Universidade Federal do ABC (UFABC), Santo Andre, SP, Brazil.
Amedea Barozzi SeabraCentro de Ciências Naturais e Humanas, Universidade Federal do ABC (UFABC), Santo Andre, SP, Brazil.
Lucilena Rebelo MonteiroCentro de Química e Meio Ambiente, Ipen/CNEN-SP - Instituto de Pesquisas Energeticas e Nucleares/Comissão Nacional de Energia Nuclear, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Diego Genuário GomesDepartment of Animal and Plant Biology, Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL), Londrina, PR, Brazil.
Halley Caixeta OliveiraDepartment of Animal and Plant Biology, Universidade Estadual de Londrina (UEL), Londrina, PR, Brazil.
Wallace Rosado RolimCentro de Ciências Naturais e Humanas, Universidade Federal do ABC (UFABC), Santo Andre, SP, Brazil.
Tatiane Araújo de JesusCentro de Engenharia, Modelagem e Ciências Sociais Aplicadas, Universidade Federal do ABC (UFABC), Santo Andre, SP, Brazil.
Bruno Lemos BatistaCentro de Ciências Naturais e Humanas, Universidade Federal do ABC (UFABC), Santo Andre, SP, Brazil.
Camila Neves LangeCentro de Ciências Naturais e Humanas, Universidade Federal do ABC (UFABC), Santo Andre, SP, Brazil. camila.lange@ufabc.edu.br.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3194-6432
Universidade Federal do ABC · BRUniversidade Estadual de Londrina · BRInstituto de Pesquisas Energéticas e Nucleares · BR

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 153204/2018-4Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 404815/2018-9Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 429555/2018-0Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2017/05029-8Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2018/08194-2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Copper oxide nanoparticles (CuO NPs) have been extensively explored for use in agriculture. Previous studies have indicated that application of CuO NPs might be promising for development and conservation of plants, pest control, and for the recovery of degraded soils. However, depending on the applied concentration copper can cause phytotoxic effects. In this work, biosynthesized CuO NPs (using green tea extract) were evaluated on their effects on lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) seedling growth, which were exposed at concentrations ranged between 0.2 and 300 μg mL

Indexed as

CopperLactucaMetal NanoparticlesNanoparticlesAntioxidantsEnvironmental MonitoringNitric OxideSeedlingsAntioxidantsCoppercupric oxideNitric OxideGreen teaMetallic nanoparticlesNanophytotoxicityPlantsSeedS-nitrosothiols

Identifiers

PMID32166379
OpenAlexW3012354102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.