ReviewDer Radiologe2020
[Treatment of intracranial aneurysms with flow diverters].
Review in Der Radiologe, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
clinical issueThe clinical picture of a subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) is associated with a high morbidity and mortality, due to the associated complications. Therefore, both unruptured and ruptured aneurysms are to be treated based on an individual and interdisciplinary treatment concept. Several endovascular procedures are already available for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. A more recent concept is the treatment with vessel-reconstructive stents so-called flow diverters. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: Due to the continuous development and revision of flow diverters, the initial complication rates have been significantly reduced, which now effectively and efficiently justifies their clinical use. After careful patient selection and risk-benefit assessment, the implantation of a flow diverter can also be considered for the treatment of ruptured aneurysms and is often the only therapy option in such situations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.