Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32166329›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology2020

Pharmacologic inhibition of lysine-specific demethylase 1 as a therapeutic and immune-sensitization strategy in pediatric high-grade glioma.

Cavan P Bailey, Mary Figueroa, Achintyan Gangadharan, Yanwen Yang, Megan M Romero, Bridget A Kennis, Sridevi Yadavilli, Verlene Henry, Tiara Collier, Michelle Monje and 7 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Role of lysine-specific demethylase 1 in immunotherapy of gastric cancer: An update.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Cavan P BaileyDepartment of Pediatrics , Research, The MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Mary FigueroaDepartment of Pediatrics , Research, The MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Achintyan GangadharanDepartment of Pediatrics , Research, The MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Yanwen YangDepartment of Pediatrics , Research, The MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Megan M RomeroDepartment of Pediatrics, Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Bridget A KennisDepartment of Pediatrics , Research, The MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Sridevi YadavilliCenter for Genetic Medicine Research, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC.
Verlene HenryDepartment of Pediatrics , Research, The MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Tiara CollierBrain Tumor Center, The MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Michelle MonjeDepartment of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California.
Dean A LeeDepartment of Pediatrics, Nationwide Children's and the Ohio State Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio.
Linghua WangDepartment of Genomic Medicine, The MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Javad NazarianCenter for Genetic Medicine Research, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC.
Vidya GopalakrishnanThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, Texas.
Wafik ZakyDepartment of Pediatrics , Research, The MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Oren J BecherDepartment of Pediatrics, Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois.
Joya ChandraDepartment of Pediatrics , Research, The MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USChildren's National · USNorthwestern University · USNationwide Children's Hospital · USStanford University · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI DIANE BODURKA · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Tropism Enhanced Oncolytic Adenovirus for the Treatment of Brain TumorsP50CA127001 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Juan Fueyo, FREDERICK F LANG · 2008 to 2026
$41.2M
Preclinical evaluation of a novel combinatory epigenetics based therapy for glioblastomaR21NS093387 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI CHANDRA, JOYA · 2015 to 2016
$440k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS P50 CA127001NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS093387
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiffuse midline gliomas (DMG), including brainstem diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG), are incurable pediatric high-grade gliomas (pHGG). Mutations in the H3 histone tail (H3.1/3.3-K27M) are a feature of DIPG, rendering them therapeutically sensitive to small-molecule inhibition of chromatin modifiers. Pharmacological inhibition of lysine-specific demethylase 1 (LSD1) is clinically relevant but has not been carefully investigated in pHGG or DIPG.

methodsPatient-derived DIPG cell lines, orthotopic mouse models, and pHGG datasets were used to evaluate effects of LSD1 inhibitors on cytotoxicity and immune gene expression. Immune cell cytotoxicity was assessed in DIPG cells pretreated with LSD1 inhibitors, and informatics platforms were used to determine immune infiltration of pHGG.

resultsSelective cytotoxicity and an immunogenic gene signature were established in DIPG cell lines using clinically relevant LSD1 inhibitors. Pediatric HGG patient sequencing data demonstrated survival benefit of this LSD1-dependent gene signature. Pretreatment of DIPG with these inhibitors increased lysis by natural killer (NK) cells. Catalytic LSD1 inhibitors induced tumor regression and augmented NK cell infusion in vivo to reduce tumor burden. CIBERSORT analysis of patient data confirmed NK infiltration is beneficial to patient survival, while CD8 T cells are negatively prognostic. Catalytic LSD1 inhibitors are nonperturbing to NK cells, while scaffolding LSD1 inhibitors are toxic to NK cells and do not induce the gene signature in DIPG cells.

conclusionsLSD1 inhibition using catalytic inhibitors is selectively cytotoxic and promotes an immune gene signature that increases NK cell killing in vitro and in vivo, representing a therapeutic opportunity for pHGG. KEY POINTS: 1. LSD1 inhibition using several clinically relevant compounds is selectively cytotoxic in DIPG and shows in vivo efficacy as a single agent.2. An LSD1-controlled gene signature predicts survival in pHGG patients and is seen in neural tissue from LSD1 inhibitor-treated mice.3. LSD1 inhibition enhances NK cell cytotoxicity against DIPG in vivo and in vitro with correlative genetic biomarkers.

Indexed as

Brain Stem NeoplasmsGliomaAnimalsChildHistonesHumansLysineMiceMutationHistonesLysineDIPGepigeneticsimmunotherapyLSD1NK cell

Identifiers

PMID32166329
PMCPMC7523459
OpenAlexW3011468031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.