ReviewCritical care explorations2019
Accuracy of Quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score to Predict Sepsis Mortality in 121 Studies Including 1,716,017 Individuals: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Critical care explorations, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.
- [S3 guideline on sepsis-prevention, diagnosis, therapy, and follow-up care-update 2025].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2025Guideline
- Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2026.Intensive care medicine · 2026Article
- Dual-score framework: National Early Warning Score 2 and quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores in acute pyelonephritis.World journal of nephrology · 2026Article
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Simplified Prehospital Sepsis Screening Tools for Identifying Sepsis and Predicting 30-Day Mortality: A Retrospective Diagnostic Accuracy Study.Clinical epidemiology · 2026Article
- Selecting patients for ICU up-grade from general wards: role of prognostic tools.Internal and emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Predicting 30-day mortality in older patients with suspected infections by adding performance status to quick sequential organ failure assessment.Journal of general and family medicine · 2025Article
- Correlations of three scoring systems with the prognosis of patients with liver cirrhosis complicated with sepsis syndrome.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Article
- Baseline predictors of antibiotics de-escalation from empirical therapies in an intensive care unit: a five-year retrospective study.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Improving acute care outcome in internal medicine: the role of early stabilization and intermediate care unit.Internal and emergency medicine · 2025Observational
- The Importance of Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome in Diagnosing Occult Infections: A Case Report.Cureus · 2025Article
- Accuracy of the Identification and Prognosis Prediction of SOFA-Based Sepsis-3 for Septic Patients in the Emergency Department Compared With Sepsis-2.Emergency medicine international · 2025Article
- Modified quick-SOFA score: Can it enhance prognostic assessment for hospitalized patients with chronic liver diseases?: Editorial on "Dynamic analysis of acute deterioration in chronic liver disease patients using modified quick sequential organ failure assessment".Clinical and molecular hepatology · 2024Article
- Predicting mortality in geriatric patients with fever in the emergency departments: a prospective validation study.BMC geriatrics · 2024Article
- Heart/breathing rate ratio (HBR) as a predictor of mortality in critically ill patients.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Navigating the Complexity of Scoring Systems in Sepsis Management: A Comprehensive Review.Cureus · 2024Review
- Machine Learning Predictive Model for Septic Shock in Acute Pancreatitis with Sepsis.Journal of inflammation research · 2024Article
- Applying artificial neural network in predicting sepsis mortality in the emergency department based on clinical features and complete blood count parameters.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: What Have We Learned in the Last Two Decades?Microorganisms · 2023Review
- Article
- Patients with Bacterial Sepsis Are Heterogeneous with Regard to Their Systemic Lipidomic Profiles.Metabolites · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We performed a meta-analysis to assess whether the newly introduced quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score could predict sepsis outcomes and compared its performance to systematic inflammatory response syndrome, the previously widely used screening criteria for sepsis. DATA SOURCES: We searched multiple electronic databases including MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, and Google Scholar (up to March 1, 2019) that evaluated quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score, systemic inflammatory response syndrome, or both (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews [PROSPERO]: CRD42018103327). STUDY SELECTION: Studies were included if the outcome was mortality, organ dysfunction, admission to ICU, ventilatory support, or prolonged ICU stay and if prediction performance was reported as either area under the curve, odds ratio, sensitivity, or specificity. DATA EXTRACTION: The criterion validity of the quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score and systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria were assessed by measuring its predictive validity for primary (mortality) and secondary outcomes in pooled metrics as mentioned. The data were analyzed using random effects model, and heterogeneity was explored using prespecified subgroups analyses. DATA SYNTHESIS: We screened 1,340 studies, of which 121 studies (including data for 1,716,017 individuals) were analyzed. For mortality prediction, the pooled area under the curve was higher for quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score (0.702; 95% CI, 0.685-0.718;
conclusionsOverall, quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score outperforms systemic inflammatory response syndrome in predicting sepsis outcome, but quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score has relative strengths/weaknesses (more specific but less sensitive) compared with systemic inflammatory response syndrome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.