ReviewCritical care explorations2019
Role of Wearable Accelerometer Devices in Delirium Studies: A Systematic Review.
Review in Critical care explorations, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05677646 (Wearable Sensors for Delirium Detection at an Early Stage), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Wearable Sensors for Delirium Detection at an Early Stage (WeSen_delirium) - an Exploratory Study
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Using Wearable Devices to Monitor Activity and Sleep in Inpatients With Parkinson Disease With and Without Delirium: Feasibility and Acceptability Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Innovation, Technology, and Telemedicine in Critical Care.Critical care clinics · 2026Review
- Predicting and Early Detection of Delirium through Motion Patterns: A Narrative Review.Clinical psychopharmacology and neuroscience : the official scientific journal of the Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026Review
- Proof-of-Concept of IMU-Based Detection of ICU-Relevant Agitation Motion Patterns in Healthy Volunteers.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Wearable devices for patient monitoring in the intensive care unit.Intensive care medicine experimental · 2025Review
- Development of an accelerometer-based wearable sensor approach for alcohol consumption detection.Alcohol, clinical & experimental research · 2024Article
- Circadian disturbances, anxiety and motor disturbances differentiate delirium superimposed on dementia from dementia-only.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2024Article
- Proposing a Scientific and Technological Approach to the Summaries of Clinical Issues of Inpatient Elderly with Delirium: A Viewpoint.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Sleep monitoring challenges in patients with neurocognitive disorders: A cross-sectional analysis of missing data from activity trackers.Health science reports · 2022Article
- Potentials and Challenges of Pervasive Sensing in the Intensive Care Unit.Frontiers in digital health · 2022Review
- The Digital Neurologic Examination.Digital biomarkersReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
We sought to determine the feasibility of using wearable accelerometer devices for determining delirium effects on patients' physical activity patterns and detecting delirium and delirium subtype. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science. STUDY SELECTION: Screening was performed using predefined search terms to identify original research studies using accelerometer devices for studying physical activity in relation to delirium. DATA EXTRACTION: Key data were extracted from the selected articles. DATA SYNTHESIS: Among the 14 studies identified, there were a total of 315 patients who wore accelerometer devices to record movements related to delirium. Eight studies (57.1%) used accelerometer devices to compare the activity of delirious and nondelirious patients. Delirious patients had lower activity levels, lower restlessness index, higher number of daytime immobility minutes, lower mean activity levels during the day, and higher mean activity levels at night. Delirious patients also had lower actual sleep time, lower sleep efficiency, fewer nighttime minutes resting, fewer minutes resting over 24 hours, and smaller change in activity from day to night. Six studies (42.9%) evaluated the feasibility of using accelerometer devices for detection of delirium and its subtype. Variables including number of postural changes during daytime, frequency of ultrashort, short, and continuous movements were significantly different among the nondelirium and the three delirium subtypes.
conclusionsThe results from the studies using accelerometer devices in studying delirium demonstrate that accelerometer devices can potentially detect the differences between delirious and nondelirious patients, detect delirium, and determine delirium subtype. We suggest the following directions as the next steps for future studies using accelerometer devices for predicting delirium: benchmark studies with longer data collection, larger and more diverse population size, incorporating related factors (e.g., medications), and evaluating delirium subtype and severity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.