Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32166276›Full record

ArticleCritical care explorations2019

Incidence of Dexmedetomidine Withdrawal in Adult Critically Ill Patients: A Pilot Study.

Rima H Bouajram, Krupa Bhatt, Rhiannon Croci, Laura Baumgartner, Kathleen Puntillo, James Ramsay, Ashley Thompson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care explorations, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Clonidine use during dexmedetomidine weaning: A systematic review.World journal of critical care medicine · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Dexmedetomidine in COVID-19: probing promises with prudence!The American journal of emergency medicine · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Rima H Bouajram1Department of Pharmaceutical Services, University of California, San Francisco Medical Center, San Francisco, CA.
Krupa BhattDepartment of Pharmacy, Scripps Memorial Hospital La Jolla, La Jolla, CA.
Rhiannon CrociDepartment of Health Informatics, University of California, San Francisco Medical Center, San Francisco, CA.
Laura BaumgartnerDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Touro University California College of Pharmacy, Vallejo, CA.
Kathleen PuntilloDepartment of Physiological Nursing, University of California, San Francisco School of Nursing, Napa, CA.
James RamsayDepartment of Anesthesia and Perioperative Care, University of California, San Francisco Medical Center, San Francisco, CA.
Ashley ThompsonDepartment of Pharmaceutical Services, University of California, San Francisco Medical Center, San Francisco, CA.
University of California San Francisco Medical Center · USDepartment of Physiological Sciences · RUSan Francisco VA Medical Center · USScripps Memorial Hospital · USTouro University California · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To determine the incidence of dexmedetomidine withdrawal in adult critically ill patients.

designThis was a prospective, observational study of patients from November 2017 to December 2018.

settingMedical-surgical, cardiothoracic, and neurosurgical ICUs in a tertiary care hospital. PATIENTS: Adult critically ill patients on dexmedetomidine infusions for at least 3 days.

interventionsIndicators of withdrawal were assessed at baseline and at least daily during the dexmedetomidine wean period. Delirium was assessed using the Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU. Sedation was assessed using the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale. The Withdrawal Assessment Tool-1 was performed and vital signs were recorded during each assessment. Patients were considered positive for dexmedetomidine withdrawal if they had two or more of the following symptoms: positive Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU, Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale greater than +1, positive Withdrawal Assessment Tool-1 assessment, tachycardia (heart rate > 90 beats/min), and hypertension (systolic blood pressure > 140 mm Hg or mean arterial pressure > 90). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsForty-two patients were included in the study, with 64% of patients experiencing signs of dexmedetomidine withdrawal. The median time on dexmedetomidine for all patients was 9.6 days (5.8-12.7 d), and the median dose of dexmedetomidine received was 0.8 µg/kg/hr (0.5-1 µg/kg/hr). Of the patients who were positive for withdrawal, the most prevalent withdrawal symptoms observed included delirium, hypertension, and agitation (93%, 48%, and 33%, respectively). We found no correlation between chronic opioid tolerance and incidence of withdrawal symptoms. Peak dexmedetomidine doses greater than 0.8 µg/kg/hr and cumulative daily doses of dexmedetomidine greater than 12.9 µg/kg/d were associated with a higher incidence of withdrawal.

conclusionsThe majority of patients in our study demonstrated signs that may be indicative of dexmedetomidine withdrawal. Peak and cumulative daily dexmedetomidine dose, rather than duration of therapy, may be associated with a higher incidence of withdrawal signs. Regular screening of patients on prolonged dexmedetomidine infusions is recommended to ensure safe and effective use in critically ill patients.

Indexed as

critical carecritically illdexmedetomidineintensive care unitsedationwithdrawal

Identifiers

PMID32166276
PMCPMC7063945
OpenAlexW2968559954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.