Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32166263›Full record

ArticleCritical care explorations2019

Impact of Point-of-Care Ultrasound in the Emergency Department on Care Processes and Outcomes in Critically Ill Nontraumatic Patients.

Jarrod M Mosier, Uwe Stolz, Rebecca Milligan, Akshay Roy-Chaudhury, Karen Lutrick, Cameron D Hypes, Dean Billheimer, Charles B Cairns

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care explorations, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Listen Before You Auscultate: An Active-Learning Approach to Bedside Cardiac Assessment.MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Pick Up Your Probes: A Call for Clinically Oriented Point-of-Care Ultrasound Research in COVID-19.Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jarrod M MosierDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ.
Uwe StolzDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH.
Rebecca MilliganDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ.
Akshay Roy-ChaudhuryUniversity of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, AZ.
Karen LutrickUniversity of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, AZ.
Cameron D HypesDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ.
Dean BillheimerUniversity of Arizona Center for Biomedical Informatics & Biostatistics, Mel & Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, Tucson, AZ.
Charles B CairnsDepartment of Emergency Medicine, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Outcomes data on point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in critically ill patients are lacking. This study examines the association between POCUS in the emergency department and outcomes in critically ill patients.

designRetrospective cohort study of critically ill emergency department patients in two academic emergency departments. All emergency department patients admitted to the intensive care unit or that die in the emergency department were entered prospectively into a registry.

settingTwo academic emergency departments. PATIENTS: All adult (> 18 years old) non-trauma patients with hemodynamic instability [shock index (heart rate/systolic blood pressure) > 0.6] between November 1, 2013-October 31, 2016, were included.

interventionsCohorts were assigned as follows: no POCUS (cohort 1), POCUS prior to a key intervention (cohort 2), and POCUS after a key intervention (cohort 3). A key intervention was either a fluid bolus or vasoactive drug initiation. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsMultivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between POCUS use and the primary outcome of in-hospital mortality. We conducted several sensitivity analyses including propensity score matching and inverse-probability-weighted regression-adjustment along with multiple imputation to account for non-random assignment of POCUS as well as bias due to missing data. Of the 7,734 eligible patients, 2,293 patients were excluded. The remaining 5,441 patients were included in the analysis: 4165 in Cohort 1, 614 in Cohort 2, and 662 in Cohort 3. Mortality was 22%, 29%, and 26%, respectively (

conclusionsPOCUS use prior to interventions appears to be associated with care delays and increased in-hospital mortality compared to critically ill patients with no POCUS. Further explorations of the impact of POCUS in the emergency department appear warranted.

Indexed as

critical careemergency departmentpoint-of-care ultrasoundshockultrasound

Identifiers

PMID32166263
PMCPMC7063915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.