ReviewCritical care explorations2019
Patient and Family Centered Actionable Processes of Care and Performance Measures for Persistent and Chronic Critical Illness: A Systematic Review.
Review in Critical care explorations, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- What's in a Name? The Ongoing Tangle of Chronic Critical Illness, Persistent Critical Illness, and Prolonged Acute Mechanical Ventilation.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2025Article
- Reported impact and protective factors of the care partner role during persistent critical illness: a content analysis.BMC nursing · 2024Article
- Codesign of a Quality Improvement Tool for Adults With Prolonged Critical Illness: A Modified Delphi Consensus Study.Critical care explorations · 2024Article
- Clinician-initiated written communication for families of patients at a long-term acute care hospital.PEC innovation · 2023Article
- When chronic critical illness is a family affair: A multi-perspective qualitative study of family involvement in long-term care.Chronic illness · 2023Article
- Prevalence, characteristics, and longer-term outcomes of patients with persistent critical illness attributable to COVID-19 in Scotland: a national cohort study.British journal of anaesthesia · 2022Article
- Management of the Patient with Chronic Critical Illness - Part 2.Journal of community hospital internal medicine perspectives · 2022Review
- Pediatric Chronic Critical Illness: Protocol for a Scoping Review.JMIR research protocols · 2021Article
- Simple-language tool to guide patients in recovery after prolonged treatment in the intensive care unit.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2021Article
- Sources of Distress for Residents With Chronic Critical Illness and Ventilator Dependence in Long-Term Care.Qualitative health research · 2021Article
- Health-related expectations of the chronically critically ill: a multi-perspective qualitative study.BMC palliative care · 2021Article
- Evaluation of the incidence, characteristics, and outcomes of pediatric chronic critical illness.PloS one · 2021Article
- Hospital-level variation in the development of persistent critical illness.Intensive care medicine · 2020Article
- Standardising care in the ICU: a protocol for a scoping review of tools used to improve care delivery.Systematic reviews · 2020Article
- Timing of Onset, Burden, and Postdischarge Mortality of Persistent Critical Illness in Scotland, 2005-2014: A Retrospective, Population-Based, Observational Study.Critical care explorations · 2020Article
- Rethinking Delivery of Care for Patients Requiring Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To identify actionable processes of care, quality indicators, or performance measures and their evidence base relevant to patients with persistent or chronic critical illness and their family members including themes relating to patient/family experience. DATA SOURCES: Two authors independently searched electronic, systemic review, and trial registration databases (inception to November 2016). STUDY SELECTION: We included studies with an ICU length of stay of greater than or equal to 7 days as an inclusion criterion and reported actionable processes of care; quality improvement indicators, measures, or tools; or patient/family experience. We excluded case series/reports of less than 10 patients. DATA EXTRACTION: Paired authors independently extracted data and performed risk of bias assessment. DATA SYNTHESIS: We screened 13,130 references identifying 114 primary studies and 102 relevant reviews. Primary studies reported data on 24,252 participants; median (interquartile range) sample size of 70 (32-182). We identified 42 distinct actionable processes of care, the most commonly investigated related to categories of 1) weaning methods (21 studies; 27 reviews); 2) rehabilitation, mobilization, and physiotherapy (20 studies; 40 reviews); and 3) provision of information, prognosis, and family communication (14 studies; 11 reviews). Processes with limited evidence were generally more patient-centered categories such as communication, promotion of sleep, symptom management, or family support. Of the 21 randomized controlled trials, only two were considered at low risk of bias across all six domains, whereas just two cohort studies and one qualitative study were considered of high quality.
conclusionsWe identified 42 distinct actionable processes of care relevant to patients with persistent or chronic critical illness and their families, with most frequently studied processes relating to weaning, rehabilitation/mobilization, and family communication. Qualitative studies highlighted the need to address psychologic needs and distressing symptoms as well as enabling patient communication. Our findings are informative for clinicians and decision-makers when planning high-quality patient and family-focused care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.