Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32166252›Full record

ReviewCritical care explorations2019

Patient and Family Centered Actionable Processes of Care and Performance Measures for Persistent and Chronic Critical Illness: A Systematic Review.

Louise Rose, Laura Istanboulian, Laura Allum, Lisa Burry, Craig Dale, Nicholas Hart, Kalliopi Kydonaki, Pam Ramsay, Natalie Pattison, Bronwen Connolly

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Critical care explorations, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Management of the Patient with Chronic Critical Illness - Part 2.Journal of community hospital internal medicine perspectives · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Simple-language tool to guide patients in recovery after prolonged treatment in the intensive care unit.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Rethinking Delivery of Care for Patients Requiring Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Louise Rose
Laura IstanboulianProvincial Centre of Weaning Excellence, Michael Garron Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Laura AllumLane Fox Clinical Respiratory Physiology Research Centre, London, United Kingdom.
Lisa BurryDepartment of Pharmacy, Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Craig DaleDivision of Trauma, Emergency and Critical Care, Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Nicholas HartLane Fox Clinical Respiratory Physiology Research Centre, London, United Kingdom.
Kalliopi KydonakiDepartment of Nursing, School of Health & Social Care, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, Scotland.
Pam RamsayDepartment of Nursing, School of Health & Social Care, Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, Scotland.
Natalie PattisonEast & North Herts NHS Trust, Stevenage, United Kingdom.
Bronwen ConnollyLane Fox Clinical Respiratory Physiology Research Centre, London, United Kingdom.
East and North Hertfordshire NHS Trust · GBHealth Sciences Centre · CAKing's College London · GBMount Sinai Hospital · CASunnybrook Health Science Centre · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To identify actionable processes of care, quality indicators, or performance measures and their evidence base relevant to patients with persistent or chronic critical illness and their family members including themes relating to patient/family experience. DATA SOURCES: Two authors independently searched electronic, systemic review, and trial registration databases (inception to November 2016). STUDY SELECTION: We included studies with an ICU length of stay of greater than or equal to 7 days as an inclusion criterion and reported actionable processes of care; quality improvement indicators, measures, or tools; or patient/family experience. We excluded case series/reports of less than 10 patients. DATA EXTRACTION: Paired authors independently extracted data and performed risk of bias assessment. DATA SYNTHESIS: We screened 13,130 references identifying 114 primary studies and 102 relevant reviews. Primary studies reported data on 24,252 participants; median (interquartile range) sample size of 70 (32-182). We identified 42 distinct actionable processes of care, the most commonly investigated related to categories of 1) weaning methods (21 studies; 27 reviews); 2) rehabilitation, mobilization, and physiotherapy (20 studies; 40 reviews); and 3) provision of information, prognosis, and family communication (14 studies; 11 reviews). Processes with limited evidence were generally more patient-centered categories such as communication, promotion of sleep, symptom management, or family support. Of the 21 randomized controlled trials, only two were considered at low risk of bias across all six domains, whereas just two cohort studies and one qualitative study were considered of high quality.

conclusionsWe identified 42 distinct actionable processes of care relevant to patients with persistent or chronic critical illness and their families, with most frequently studied processes relating to weaning, rehabilitation/mobilization, and family communication. Qualitative studies highlighted the need to address psychologic needs and distressing symptoms as well as enabling patient communication. Our findings are informative for clinicians and decision-makers when planning high-quality patient and family-focused care.

Indexed as

chronic critical illnessintensive carepersistent critical illnessprocess of carequality indicator

Identifiers

PMID32166252
PMCPMC7063874
OpenAlexW2936423227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.