ArticleCritical care explorations2019
Increasing Cardiovascular Data Sampling Frequency and Referencing It to Baseline Improve Hemorrhage Detection.
Article in Critical care explorations, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Early Physiologic Numerical and Waveform Characteristics of Simulated Hemorrhagic Events With Healthy Volunteers Donating Blood.Critical care explorations · 2024Article
- Intelligent Clinical Decision Support.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Automated Assessment of Cardiovascular Sufficiency Using Non-Invasive Physiological Data.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Coronavirus Disease 2019 Calls for Predictive Analytics Monitoring-A New Kind of Illness Scoring System.Critical care explorations · 2020Article
- Estimating Surgical Blood Loss Volume Using Continuously Monitored Vital Signs.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Development of hemorrhage identification model using non-invasive vital signs.Physiological measurement · 2020Article
- Continuous ECG monitoring should be the heart of bedside AI-based predictive analytics monitoring for early detection of clinical deterioration.Journal of electrocardiologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
We hypothesize that knowledge of a stable personalized baseline state and increased data sampling frequency would markedly improve the ability to detect progressive hypovolemia during hemorrhage earlier and with a lower false positive rate than when using less granular data.
designProspective temporal challenge.
settingLarge animal research laboratory, University Medical Center. SUBJECTS: Fifty-one anesthetized Yorkshire pigs.
interventionsPigs were instrumented with arterial, pulmonary arterial, and central venous catheters and allowed to stabilize for 30 minutes then bled at a constant rate of either 5 mL·min MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN
resultsData during the stabilization period served as baseline. Hemodynamic variables collected at 250 Hz were used to create predictive models of "bleeding" using featurized beat-to-beat and waveform data and compared with models using mean unfeaturized hemodynamic variables averaged over 1-minute as simple hemodynamic metrics using random forest classifiers to identify bleeding with or without baseline data. The robustness of the prediction was evaluated in a leave-one-pig-out cross-validation. Predictive performance of models was compared by their activity monitoring operating characteristic and receiver operating characteristic profiles. Primary hemodynamic threshold data poorly identified bleed onset unless very stable initial baseline reference data were available. When referenced to baseline, bleed detection at a false positive rates of 10
conclusionsKnowledge of personal stable baseline data allows for early detection of new-onset bleeding, whereas if no personal baseline exists increasing sampling frequency of hemodynamic monitoring data improves bleeding detection earlier and with lower false positive rate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.