Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32166132›Full record

ArticleBrain and neuroscience advances

Deep brain stimulation of the nucleus accumbens core but not shell reduces motivational components of heroin taking and seeking in rats.

Maria C Schippers, Mathijs Gaastra, Tanja Mesman, Dustin Schetters, Yvar van Mourik, Damiaan Denys, Tommy Pattij, Taco J De Vries

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain and neuroscience advances. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 94% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Maria C SchippersDepartment of Anatomy & Neurosciences, Amsterdam Neuroscience, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Mathijs GaastraDepartment of Anatomy & Neurosciences, Amsterdam Neuroscience, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Tanja MesmanDepartment of Anatomy & Neurosciences, Amsterdam Neuroscience, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Dustin SchettersDepartment of Anatomy & Neurosciences, Amsterdam Neuroscience, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Yvar van MourikDepartment of Anatomy & Neurosciences, Amsterdam Neuroscience, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Damiaan DenysDepartment of Psychiatry, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Tommy PattijDepartment of Anatomy & Neurosciences, Amsterdam Neuroscience, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Taco J De VriesDepartment of Anatomy & Neurosciences, Amsterdam Neuroscience, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam Neuroscience · NLUniversity of Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDeep brain stimulation is explored as a new intervention for treatment-resistant substance use dependence. A candidate brain region is the nucleus accumbens, due to its involvement in reward and motivation. This study aimed to explore effects of NAcore and NAshell deep brain stimulation on aspects of heroin taking and seeking in a self-administration model for rats.

methodsNAcore and NAshell deep brain stimulation was applied during 25 or 100 µg/kg/infusion heroin self-administration on an FR4 schedule of reinforcement and during cue- and heroin-induced reinstatement. In a separate group, effects of NAcore deep brain stimulation on heroin self-administration on a progressive ratio schedule and the first extinction session were examined.

resultsNAcore and NAshell deep brain stimulation did not alter heroin self-administration on an FR4 schedule. NAcore deep brain stimulation decreased cue - but not drug-induced reinstatement of heroin seeking, whereas NAshell deep brain stimulation did not affect reinstatement responding. In the second experiment, NAcore deep brain stimulation reduced responding during a progressive ratio schedule of heroin reinforcement. Finally, deep brain stimulation facilitated extinction from day 1 throughout the course of extinction learning.

conclusionTaken together, the differential effects of NAcore and NAshell deep brain stimulation on heroin taking and seeking are in line with the distinct functional roles of these sub-regions therein. Conditioned cues have been shown to be very powerful stimuli for the persistence of addiction and relapse to drug use. Therefore, the present findings that NAcore deep brain stimulation decreases motivation for heroin taking and cue-conditioned behaviour and facilitates extinction learning are very promising, supporting the positive findings from clinical case studies.

Indexed as

addictionDeep brain stimulationheroinnucleus accumbens

Identifiers

PMID32166132
PMCPMC7058223
OpenAlexW2621232359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.