Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32166129›Full record

ArticleGlobal health research and policy2020

Frameworks for health systems performance assessment: how comprehensive is Ghana's holistic assessment tool?

Emmanuel Kumah, Samuel E Ankomah, Adam Fusheini, Emmanuel Kusi Sarpong, Eric Anyimadu, Ato Quist, Brian Koomson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global health research and policy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Emmanuel Kumah1Policy, Planning, Monitoring & Evaluation Unit, Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital, Kumasi, Ghana.
Samuel E Ankomah2Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Adam Fusheini2Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Emmanuel Kusi Sarpong4Biostatistics Unit, Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital, Kumasi, Ghana.
Eric Anyimadu1Policy, Planning, Monitoring & Evaluation Unit, Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital, Kumasi, Ghana.
Ato Quist1Policy, Planning, Monitoring & Evaluation Unit, Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital, Kumasi, Ghana.
Brian Koomson1Policy, Planning, Monitoring & Evaluation Unit, Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital, Kumasi, Ghana.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Measuring the performance of a health system is an essential requirement in creating systems that generate efficient, equitable, patient-focused, accessible and sustainable results. A fundamental requirement for a performance measurement system is the development of an assessment framework within which specific performance measures could be defined and applied regularly. This paper examines the comprehensiveness of Ghana's health system assessment framework called the Holistic Assessment Tool in relation to some of the internationally recognized frameworks. The paper also analyzes trends in the performance of the health system to understand whether or not an improvement has been recorded following the adoption and implementation of the Holistic Assessment Tool. Methods: Mainly secondary data were used in this analysis Results: While the tool provides a national framework for evaluating the performance of the Ghana Health system in several domains, the Holistic Assessment Tool does not cover key health system domains such as information systems for health, access to essential medicines, and patient-centeredness. Also, the scope of the assessment program seems limited to the evaluation of the Ministry of Health's annual plans, programs and projects. However, the health system has recorded improvements in population health indicators, such as life expectancy at birth, infant mortality, under-5 mortality, HIV prevalence and disease burden (in terms of disability adjusted life years). Conclusions: The Holistic Assessment Tool is a useful framework, but needs further refinement, both in scope and in conceptual robustness. Future studies should consider exploring factors influencing performance of the Ghanaian health system. Such information will help in strategizing for better and more improvements.

Indexed as

Health PolicyData ManagementDelivery of Health CareGhanaGovernment ProgramsHealth ServicesDeveloping countryHealth indicatorsHealth system in GhanaHealth systemsPerformance assessment frameworkTrend assessment

Identifiers

PMID32166129
PMCPMC7061475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.