Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32166045›Full record

ArticleMRS communications2019

Materials Science in the AI age: high-throughput library generation, machine learning and a pathway from correlations to the underpinning physics.

Rama K Vasudevan, Kamal Choudhary, Apurva Mehta, Ryan Smith, Gilad Kusne, Francesca Tavazza, Lukas Vlcek, Maxim Ziatdinov, Sergei V Kalinin, Jason Hattrick-Simpers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MRS communications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. CHIPS-TB: Evaluating Tight-Binding Models for Metals, Semiconductors, and Insulators.The journal of physical chemistry. C, Nanomaterials and interfaces · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Rama K VasudevanCenter for Nanophase Materials Sciences, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge TN 37831, USA.
Kamal ChoudharyMaterial Measurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899.
Apurva MehtaStanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Menlo Park, CA 94025.
Ryan SmithMaterial Measurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899.
Gilad KusneMaterial Measurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899.
Francesca TavazzaMaterial Measurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899.
Lukas VlcekMaterial Measurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899.
Maxim ZiatdinovCenter for Nanophase Materials Sciences, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge TN 37831, USA.
Sergei V KalininCenter for Nanophase Materials Sciences, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge TN 37831, USA.
Jason Hattrick-SimpersMaterial Measurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899.

Funding

Intramural NIST DOC 9999-NIST
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of advanced data analytics and applications of statistical and machine learning approaches ('AI') to materials science is experiencing explosive growth recently. In this prospective, we review recent work focusing on generation and application of libraries from both experiment and theoretical tools, across length scales. The available library data both enables classical correlative machine learning, and also opens the pathway for exploration of underlying causative physical behaviors. We highlight the key advances facilitated by this approach, and illustrate how modeling, macroscopic experiments and atomic-scale imaging can be combined to dramatically accelerate understanding and development of new material systems via a statistical physics framework. These developments point towards a data driven future wherein knowledge can be aggregated and used collectively, accelerating the advancement of materials science.

Identifiers

PMID32166045
PMCPMC7067066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.