ArticleInternational journal of mental health systems2020
Healthcare professionals' perspectives on mental health service provision: a pilot focus group study in six European countries.
Article in International journal of mental health systems, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mental health treatment and access for emerging adults in Canada: a systematic review.Frontiers in public health · 2023Pooled it
- Facilitating Personal Recovery in the Community: a Qualitative Evaluation of a Peer Support Group for Adults with Severe Mental Health Challenges in Rural Australia.Community mental health journal · 2026Article
- New policies, old habits: why and how Dutch mental healthcare moves towards collaboration.International journal of mental health systems · 2026Article
- Digital Divide: Contrasting Provider and User Insights on Healthcare Services During the COVID-19 Pandemic.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- General Practitioners' Perceptions on Prescribing Coastal Visits for Mental Health in Flanders (Belgium).Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Digital Healthcare Innovative Services in Times of Crisis: A Literature Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Person-centered care for common mental disorders in Ontario's primary care patient-centered medical homes: a qualitative study of provider perspectives.BMC primary care · 2024Article
- Psychologists' involvement in and experiences of treating patients with stress-related exhaustion in primary care.BMC primary care · 2024Article
- Shortcomings of services for persons with severe and persistent mental health challenges: a qualitative study of service users and family carers.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2024Article
- Help-Seeking Intentions for Depression from Mental Health Professionals Among Community-Dwelling Persons in Central China.Administration and policy in mental health · 2023Article
- Emotion-Focused Mobile App for Promoting Self-Compassion, Self-Protection, and Self-Criticism.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Utilizing the mental health nursing workforce: A scoping review of mental health nursing clinical roles and identities.International journal of mental health nursing · 2022Article
- Mental Health Professionals' Attitudes Towards People with Severe Mental Illness: Are they Related to Professional Quality of Life?Community mental health journal · 2022Article
- Flexible Assertive Community Treatment in Rural and Remote Areas: A Qualitative Study of the Challenges and Adaptations of the Model.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- Priorities for family physician and general practitioner recruitment and retention in Singapore: a PRIORITIZE study.BMC family practice · 2021Article
- Flexible assertive community treatment teams can change complex and fragmented service systems: experiences of service providers.International journal of mental health systems · 2021Article
- Integration of Care in Complex and Fragmented Service Systems: Experiences of Staff in Flexible Assertive Community Treatment Teams.International journal of integrated careArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors at 8 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe mental healthcare treatment gap (mhcGAP) in adult populations has been substantiated across Europe. This study formed part of MentALLY, a research project funded by the European Commission, which aimed to gather qualitative empirical evidence to support the provision of European mental healthcare that provides effective treatment to all adults who need it.
methodsSeven focus groups were conducted with 49 health professionals (HPs), including psychologists, psychiatrists, social workers, general practitioners, and psychiatric nurses who worked in health services in Belgium, Cyprus, Greece, the Netherlands, Norway and Sweden. The focus group discussions centered on the barriers and facilitators to providing quality care to people with mild, medium, and severe mental health problems. Analyses included deductively and inductively driven coding procedures. Cross-country consensus was obtained by summarizing findings in the form of a fact sheet which was shared for triangulation by all the MentALLY partners.
resultsThe results converged into two overarching themes: (1) Minding the treatment gap: the availability and accessibility of Mental Health Services (MHS). The mhcGAP gap identified is composed of different elements that constitute the barriers to care, including bridging divides in care provision, obstacles in facilitating access via referrals and creating a collaborative 'chain of care'. (2) Making therapeutic practice relevant by providing a broad-spectrum of integrated and comprehensive services that value person-centered care comprised of authenticity, flexibility and congruence.
conclusionsThe mhcGAP is comprised of the following barriers: a lack of funding, insufficient capacity of human resources, inaccessibility to comprehensive services and a lack of availability of relevant treatments. The facilitators to the provision of MHC include using collaborative models of primary, secondary and prevention-oriented mental healthcare. Teamwork in providing care was considered to be a more effective and efficient use of resources. HPs believe that the use of e-mental health and emerging digital technologies can enhance care provision. Facilitating access to a relevant continuum of community-based care that is responsive coordinated and in line with people's needs throughout their lives is an essential aspect of optimal care provision.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.