Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32165916›Full record

ArticleInfectious agents and cancer2020

Is the HERV-K HML-2 Xq21.33, an endogenous retrovirus mutated by gene conversion of chromosome X in a subset of African populations, associated with human breast cancer?

Mark H Kaplan, Rafael Contreras-Galindo, Evelyn Jiagge, Sofia D Merajver, Lisa Newman, Galya Bigman, Michael H Dosik, Ganesh S Palapattu, Javed Siddiqui, Arul M Chinnaiyan and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infectious agents and cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Mark H Kaplan1Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA.
Rafael Contreras-GalindoHormel Institute, University of Minnesota, Mayo Clinic, Austin, MN 55912 USA.
Evelyn Jiagge3Henry Ford Cancer Institute, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Mi USA.
Sofia D Merajver4Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA.
Lisa Newman5Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY 10021 USA.
Galya Bigman6Institute of Human Virology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA.
Michael H DosikDepartment of Internal Medicine, Renaissance School of Medicine at Stony Brook Medical, Stony Brook, NY 11794 USA.
Ganesh S Palapattu8Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA.
Javed Siddiqui9Department of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA.
Arul M Chinnaiyan9Department of Pathology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA.
Sally Adebamowo6Institute of Human Virology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA.
Clement Adebamowo6Institute of Human Virology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA.
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · USHenry Ford Health System · USStony Brook School · USUniversity of Minnesota · USWeill Cornell Medicine · US

Funding

Training Program in Nigeria for NCD Research (TRAPING - NCD)D43TW009106 · FIC · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI ADEBAMOWO, CLEMENT ADEBAYO · 2011 to 2015
$1.1M
FIC NIH HHS D43 TW009106
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The human endogenous retroviruses HERV-K HML-2 have been considered a possible cause of human breast cancer (BrC). A HERV-K HML-2 fully intact provirus Xq21.33 was recently identified in some West African people. We used PCR technology to search for the Xq21.33 provirus in DNA from Nigerian women with BrC and controls. to see if Xq21.33 plays any role in predisposing to BrC. This provirus was detected in 27 of 216 (12.5%) women with BrC and in 22 of 219 (10.0%) controls. These results were not statistically significant. The prevalence of provirus in premenopausal control women 44 years or younger [18/157 (11.46%)} vs women with BrC [12/117 (10.26%)] showed no statistical difference. The prevalence of virus in postmenopausal control women > 45 yrs. was 7.4% (4/54) vs 15.31% (15/98) in postmenopausal women with BrC. These changes were not statistically significant at <.05, but the actual

Indexed as

Breast cancerEndogenous virusesGene conversionHERV-KHERV-K HML-2Xq21.33

Identifiers

PMID32165916
PMCPMC7060579
OpenAlexW3012372643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.