Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32165771›Full record

ArticlePlant and soil2017

Soil resilience and recovery: rapid community responses to management changes.

Penny R Hirsch, Deveraj Jhurreea, Jennifer K Williams, Philip J Murray, Tony Scott, Tom H Misselbrook, Keith W T Goulding, Ian M Clark

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant and soil, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Defining the wheat microbiome: Towards microbiome-facilitated crop production.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Penny R Hirsch1Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, Hertfordshire AL5 2JQ UK.
Deveraj Jhurreea1Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, Hertfordshire AL5 2JQ UK.
Jennifer K Williams2Rothamsted Research, North Wyke, Okehampton, Devon EX20 2SB UK.
Philip J Murray2Rothamsted Research, North Wyke, Okehampton, Devon EX20 2SB UK.
Tony Scott1Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, Hertfordshire AL5 2JQ UK.
Tom H Misselbrook2Rothamsted Research, North Wyke, Okehampton, Devon EX20 2SB UK.
Keith W T Goulding1Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, Hertfordshire AL5 2JQ UK.
Ian M Clark1Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, Hertfordshire AL5 2JQ UK.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/C/00005741
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsSoil degradation is a major global problem; to investigate the potential for recovery of soil biota and associated key functions, soils were monitored during the early years of conversion between permanent grassland, arable cropping and bare fallow (maintained by regular tilling). Distinct differences in soil properties had become apparent 50 years after a previous conversion.

methodsSubplots on previously permanent grassland, arable and bare fallow soil were converted to the two alternatives, generating 9 treatments. Soil properties (soil organic carbon, mesofauna, microbial community structure and activity) were measured.

resultsAfter 2 years, mesofauna and microbial abundance increased where plants were grown on previously bare fallow soils and declined where grassland was converted to bare fallow treatment. Overall prokaryote community composition remained more similar to the previous treatments of the converted plots than to the new treatments but there were significant changes in the relative abundance of some groups and functional genes. Four years after conversion, SOC in arable and bare fallow soils converted to grassland had increased significantly.

conclusionsConversion to permanent grassland effectively replenished C in previously degraded soil; the soil microbiome showed significant conversion-related changes; plant-driven recovery was quicker than C loss in the absence of plants.

Indexed as

Bare fallow soilGrassNitrogen-cycling genesSoil bacteriaSoil fungiSoil mesofaunaSoil microbiomeSoil organic carbonWheat

Identifiers

PMID32165771
PMCPMC7045894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.