Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32165611›Full record

ArticleNature communications2020

Autophagy-dependent filopodial kinetics restrict synaptic partner choice during Drosophila brain wiring.

Ferdi Ridvan Kiral, Gerit Arne Linneweber, Thomas Mathejczyk, Svilen Veselinov Georgiev, Mathias F Wernet, Bassem A Hassan, Max von Kleist, Peter Robin Hiesinger

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Turning garbage into gold: Autophagy in synaptic function.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2025
    Review
  12. Interplay between autophagy and CncC regulates dendrite pruning inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Synaptic promiscuity in brain development.Current biology : CB · 2024
    Review
  15. Review
  16. NeuronalCells · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Autophagy in axonal and presynaptic development.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2021
    Review
  20. Autophagy and the endolysosomal system in presynaptic function.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ferdi Ridvan KiralDivision of Neurobiology, Institute for Biology, Freie Universität Berlin, 14195, Berlin, Germany.
Gerit Arne LinneweberDivision of Neurobiology, Institute for Biology, Freie Universität Berlin, 14195, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8393-6426
Thomas MathejczykDivision of Neurobiology, Institute for Biology, Freie Universität Berlin, 14195, Berlin, Germany.
Svilen Veselinov GeorgievDivision of Neurobiology, Institute for Biology, Freie Universität Berlin, 14195, Berlin, Germany.
Mathias F WernetDivision of Neurobiology, Institute for Biology, Freie Universität Berlin, 14195, Berlin, Germany.
Bassem A HassanDivision of Neurobiology, Institute for Biology, Freie Universität Berlin, 14195, Berlin, Germany.
Max von KleistMF1 Bioinformatics, Robert Koch-Institute, 13353, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6587-6394
Peter Robin HiesingerDivision of Neurobiology, Institute for Biology, Freie Universität Berlin, 14195, Berlin, Germany. robin.hiesinger@fu-berlin.de.
Freie Universität Berlin · DECentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRRobert Koch Institute · DE

Funding

Regulation of Synaptic Specificity in the Visual System by Intracellular TraffickR01EY018884 · NEI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI HIESINGER, PETER ROBIN · 2008 to 2018
$3.6M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY018884
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain wiring is remarkably precise, yet most neurons readily form synapses with incorrect partners when given the opportunity. Dynamic axon-dendritic positioning can restrict synaptogenic encounters, but the spatiotemporal interaction kinetics and their regulation remain essentially unknown inside developing brains. Here we show that the kinetics of axonal filopodia restrict synapse formation and partner choice for neurons that are not otherwise prevented from making incorrect synapses. Using 4D imaging in developing Drosophila brains, we show that filopodial kinetics are regulated by autophagy, a prevalent degradation mechanism whose role in brain development remains poorly understood. With surprising specificity, autophagosomes form in synaptogenic filopodia, followed by filopodial collapse. Altered autophagic degradation of synaptic building material quantitatively regulates synapse formation as shown by computational modeling and genetic experiments. Increased filopodial stability enables incorrect synaptic partnerships. Hence, filopodial autophagy restricts inappropriate partner choice through a process of kinetic exclusion that critically contributes to wiring specificity.

Indexed as

AutophagyAnimalsAttentionAxonsBrainDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsGreen Fluorescent ProteinsKineticsMosaicismPhotoreceptor Cells, InvertebrateProteolysisPseudopodiaSynapsesSynaptic TransmissionDrosophila ProteinsGreen Fluorescent Proteins

Identifiers

PMID32165611
PMCPMC7067798
OpenAlexW3011763943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.