Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32165550›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2020

mHealth: providing a mindfulness app for women with chronic pelvic pain in gynaecology outpatient clinics: qualitative data analysis of user experience and lessons learnt.

Elizabeth Ball, Sian Newton, Frank Rohricht, Liz Steed, Judy Birch, Julie Dodds, Clara Cantalapiedra Calvete, Stephanie Taylor, Carol Rivas

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. COVID-19 in Women's health: Pre-operative gynaecological assessment and shared decision making.Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Elizabeth BallDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8739-090X
Sian NewtonCentre for Women's Health, Institute of Population Health Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Frank RohrichtCentre for Psychiatry, Wolfson Institute for Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Liz SteedCentre for Primary Care and Mental Health, Institute of Population Health Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Judy BirchPelvic Pain Support Network, Poole, UK.
Julie DoddsCentre for Women's Health, Institute of Population Health Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Clara Cantalapiedra CalveteDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK.
Stephanie TaylorCentre for Primary Care and Mental Health, Institute of Population Health Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Carol RivasUCL Social Research Institute, University College London, London, UK c.rivas@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-0316-8090
Queen Mary University of London · GBBarts Health NHS Trust · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo determine whether a pre-existing smartphone app to teach mindfulness meditation is acceptable to women with chronic pelvic pain (CPP) and can be integrated into clinical practice within the National Health Service (NHS) CPP pathways, and to inform the design of a potential randomised clinical trial.

designA prestudy patient and public involvement (PPI) group to collect feedback on the acceptability of the existing app and study design was followed by a three-arm randomised feasibility trial. In addition, we undertook interviews and focus groups with patients and staff to explore app usability and acceptability. We also obtained participant comments on the research process, such as acceptability of the study questionnaires.

settingTwo gynaecology clinics within Barts Health NHS, London, UK.

participantsPatients with CPP lasting ≥6 months with access to smartphone or personal computer and understanding of basic English.

interventionThe intervention was mindfulness meditation content plus additional pain module delivered by a smartphone app. Active controls received muscle relaxation content from the same app. Passive (waiting list) controls received usual care.

main outcome measuresThemes on user feedback, app usability and integration, and reasons for using/not using the app.

resultsThe use of the app was low in both active groups. Patients in the prestudy PPI group, all volunteers, were enthusiastic about the app (convenience, content, portability, flexibility, ease of use). Women contributing to the interview or focus group data (n=14), from a 'real world' clinic (some not regular app users), were less positive, citing as barriers lack of opportunities/motivation to use the app and lack of familiarity and capabilities with technology. Staff (n=7) were concerned about the potential need for extra support for them and for the patients, and considered the app needed organisational backing and peer acceptance.

conclusionThe opinions of prestudy PPI volunteers meeting in their private time may not represent those of patients recruited at a routine clinic appointment. It may be more successful to codesign/codevelop an app with typical users than to adapt existing apps for use in real-world clinical populations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN10925965.

Indexed as

Mobile ApplicationsAdultAmbulatory CareChronic PainFeasibility StudiesFemaleFocus GroupsHumansInterviews as TopicMeditationMindfulnessPatient Acceptance of Health CarePelvic PainRelaxation TherapySmartphoneState Medicinechronic pelvic painfeasibility studyhealth appmHealthmindfulnesspatient engagement

Identifiers

PMID32165550
PMCPMC7069307
OpenAlexW3012262553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.